An Empirical Evaluation of Detecting Omissions by Comparing Words between Requirement and Architectural Documents
An Empirical Evaluation of Detecting Omissions by Comparing Words between Requirement and Architectural Documents
复制标题
通过比较需求和建筑文档之间的单词来检测遗漏的实证评估
DOI:
10.1109/iwesep.2017.20
复制
发表时间:
2017
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Shuichiro Yamamoto
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
T. Wakabayashi;Shuji Morisaki;Noritoshi Atsumi;Shuichiro Yamamoto
This paper presents the result of the empirical evaluation of detection of omitted requirements that are not described by using words appearance and words senses appearance. The evaluation investigated whether omitted requirements can be detected by difference between a set of words in software requirement document and a set of words in software architectural design document. The evaluation also investigated whether omitted requirements can be detected by difference between a set of words senses. First, the evaluation extracted a set of words that appear in a software requirement document and do not appear in the corresponding software architectural design document. The evaluation extracted a set of words senses that appear in a requirement document and do not appear in software architectural design document. Then, an analyst checked whether corresponding design description with each requirement sentence that contains each word and word sense of the sets exist or not. The result of the word appearance evaluation with 5 pairs of software requirement document and architectural design document shows that 82 requirement sentences were not described in the corresponding architectural design document. The result of the word sense appearance evaluation with 2 pairs of documents shows that 31 requirement sentences were not described in the corresponding architectural design document in addition to the word appearance evaluation.