Group-to-Group Distance Collaboration: Examining the "Space Between"
Group-to-Group Distance Collaboration: Examining the "Space Between"
复制标题
组对组的远程协作：检查“之间的空间”
DOI：
10.1007/978-94-010-0068-0_6
复制
发表时间：
2003
影响因子：
8.3
通讯作者：
N. Nassif
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
G. Mark;Steve Abrams;N. Nassif
组织正在走向一种新的工作类型：远距离组对组协作，其支持是将远距离房间连接到大型协作空间的技术。在这项研究中，我们报告了空间任务设计领域中的分布式组对组协作。我们用“相距遥远的群体之间的空间”这个比喻来描述存在的联系、相互依赖和差距。如果“间距”仍然很大，设计错误的风险就会增加。我们发现，拥有不同流程和方法的不同团队能够形成混合解决方案。然而，他们的混合解决方案主要涉及术语和结果，而没有解决产生结果的更深层次的方法。我们还发现，一些个人充当了跨站点的信息桥梁，代表团队的清晰表达。在很大程度上，小团体被用来协调观点，但大多数结果没有传达并重新整合到更大的团队中。我们讨论了组到组协作设计人员在满足支持这些新技术的要求方面所面临的挑战。
Organizations are moving towards a new type of work: group-to-group collaboration across distance, supported by technologies that connect rooms across distance into large collaboration spaces. In this study we report on distributed group-to-group collaboration in the domain of space mission design. We use the metaphor of the "space between" distant groups to describe the connections, interdependencies, and gaps that exist. To the extent that the "space between" remains wide, the risk for design errors increases. We found that different teams, who had different processes and methodologies, were able to form hybrid solutions. However, their hybrid solutions addressed mostly terms and results, and did not address the deeper methodologies that created the results. We also found that some individuals acted as information bridges across sites, representing the teams in articulation. To a large extent small groups were used for reconciling perspectives, but the majority of results were not communicated and integrated back into the larger team. We discuss the challenges that group-to-group collaboration designers face in meeting requirements for supporting these new technologies.
DOI：
10.1007/978-3-319-03068-5_10
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
Roast C
通讯作者：
Roast C