ON THE COMPARATIVE ALLOCATION OF BIOMASS, ENERGY, AND NUTRIENTS IN PLANTS
ON THE COMPARATIVE ALLOCATION OF BIOMASS, ENERGY, AND NUTRIENTS IN PLANTS
复制标题
DOI：
10.2307/1937238
复制
发表时间：
1982-01-01
期刊：
影响因子：
4.8
通讯作者：
CASWELL, H
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
ABRAHAMSON, WG;CASWELL, H
假设生物量分配，能量分配，营养元素分配是等效的研究，涉及生态策略分析植物进行了测试。结果表明，毛蕊花和一枝黄花的单生种和5种单生种的结果均与试验结果相一致。[S. nemoralis、S. rugosa、S. caradensis、S. flexicaulis，S.结果表明，所研究的矿物元素的分配与生物量不同。因此，在估计种群内植物的分配策略时，生物量分配并不反映养分分配。有大量的营养素。种群之间的相互作用，这意味着种群之间的生物量分配趋势并不反映矿物元素分配的质量趋势。这项研究没有确定一个给定的矿物元素，生物量，或能源作为资源分配模式的最佳措施。结果与一枝黄花生物量分配和能量分配之间表现出很强的相关性。这再次强调了Hickman和Pitelka（1975）的结论，即热量测定法对于确定以碳水化合物种子储备为主的植物种群内的能量分配模式是不必要的。土壤养分与一枝黄花植物器官或整株植物的化学成分之间总体上缺乏相关性。
The assumption that biomass allocation, energy allocation, and nutrient element allocation are equivalent for studies involving ecological-strategy analysis in plants was tested. The results for the semelparous Verbascum thapsus and 5 iteroparous Solidago spp. [S. nemoralis, S. rugosa, S. caradensis, S. flexicaulis, S. caesia] show that the mineral elements examined are allocated differently than biomass. Thus, in estimating the allocation strategy of plants within a population, biomass allocation does not reflect nutrient allocation. There are significant nutrient .times. population interactions, which means that between-population trends in biomass allocation do not reflect qualitative trends in mineral element allocation. This study does not identify a given mineral element, biomass, or energy as the best measure of resource allocation patterns. Results with Solidago show strong correlation between biomass allocation and energy allocation. This reemphasizes Hickman and Pitelka''s (1975) conclusion that calorimetry is not necessary to determine energy allocation patterns within populations in plants with primarily carbohydrate seed reserves. There was an overall lack of correlation between soil nutrients and the chemical composition of Solidago plant organs or whole plants.