HISTORICAL ORIGINS OF STATISTICAL TESTING PRACTICES - THE TREATMENT OF FISHER VERSUS NEYMAN-PEARSON VIEWS IN TEXTBOOKS
HISTORICAL ORIGINS OF STATISTICAL TESTING PRACTICES - THE TREATMENT OF FISHER VERSUS NEYMAN-PEARSON VIEWS IN TEXTBOOKS
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/00220973.1993.10806593
复制
发表时间：
1993-06-01
影响因子：
2.2
通讯作者：
HUBERTY, CJ
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
HUBERTY, CJ
教科书中对统计检验的讨论是一个有趣的话题。从1910年到1949年出版的28本书，1990年到1992年出版的19本书，加上5个多版本的书籍进行了审查，介绍统计检验。有趣的是，发现教科书对P值的覆盖（即，Fisher）和固定α（即，Neyman-Pearson）方法进行统计检验。在审查中还感兴趣的是与统计检验的实践和教学有关的一些问题和关切：（a）显著性水平，（B）效应的重要性，（c）统计功效和样本大小，以及（d）多重检验。它的结论是，这不是统计测试本身是错误的，而是一些教科书的介绍，教学实践和期刊编辑审查可能会受到质疑。
Textbook discussion of statistical testing is the topic of interest. Some 28 books published from 1910 to 1949, 19 books published from 1990 to 1992, plus five multiple-edition books were reviewed in terms of presentations of statistical testing. It was of interest to discover textbook coverage of the P-value (i.e., Fisher) and fixed-alpha (i.e., Neyman-Pearson) approaches to statistical testing. Also of interest in the review were some issues and concerns related to the practice and teaching of statistical testing: (a) levels of significance, (b) importance of effects, (c) statistical power and sample size, and (d) multiple testing. It is concluded that it is not statistical testing itself that is at fault; rather, some of the textbook presentation, teaching practices, and journal editorial reviewing may be questioned.