An X‐ray study of male pelves
An X‐ray study of male pelves
复制标题
男性骨盆的 X 射线研究
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1939
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
H. Thoms
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
W. Greulich;H. Thoms
通过Thorns的X线骨盆测量方法，我们最近测定了582名来自纽黑文医院产科诊所的妊娠期白色妇女和104名来自不同种族和更优越经济群体的未产妇的年轻白色妇女的骨盆入口的大小和形状。后者大多数是耶鲁大学护理学院的学生。在解剖学和产科学教科书中描述为“正常”女性骨盆的骨盆类型在临床妇女中仅占14.9%，在实习护士中仅占5.7%。事实上，只有35.2%的诊所女性和13.5%的实习护士拥有这种骨盆，根据人类学文献，这种骨盆适合白色女性（Greulich和Thorns，'39）。为了确定现代白色男性的骨盆是否和教科书上的骨盆一样有差异，我们对69名耶鲁大学医学生的骨盆进行了前后位和侧位的X光片检查。本文的目的是描述在这组中发现的骨盆类型，并将它们与解剖学教科书中描述的男性骨盆进行比较。
By means of Thorns’ method of x-ray pelvimetry, we recently determined the size and shape of the pelvic inlet of 582 primigravid white women from the obstetrical clinic of the New Haven Hospital and of 104 nulliparous young white women from a somewhat different racial stock and a much more privileged economic group. Most of the latter were students of the Yale School of Nursing. The type of pelvis which is descrbed in textbooks of anatomy and of obstetrics as the ‘normal’ female pelvis was found in only 14.9% of the clinic women and in only 5.7% of the student nurses. Indeed, only 35.2% of the clinic women and 13.5% of the student nurses had the type of pelvis which, according to the anthropological literature, is proper for white women (Greulich and Thorns, ’39). In an attempt to determine whether the pelvis of the present-day white male differs from its textbook counterpart as much as does that of the female, we have made anteroposterior and lateral roentgenograms of the pelves of sixtynine Yale medical students. The purpose of this paper is to describe the types of pelves found in that group and to compare them with the male pelvis as it is described in textbooks of anatomy.