Parallels and differences in the treatment of metaphor in relevance theory and cognitive linguistics
Parallels and differences in the treatment of metaphor in relevance theory and cognitive linguistics
复制标题
关联理论和认知语言学处理隐喻的异同
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2011
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Deirdre Wilson
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Deirdre Wilson
摘要 认知语言学家和关联理论家都在发展隐喻的独创方法。两者都为旧的争论提供了新的线索，并为研究提出了富有成效的方向。尽管迄今为止这两种方法之间几乎没有互动，但 Raymond Gibbs 和 Markus Tendahl (Mind & Language 21: 379–403, 2006, Journal of Pragmatics 40: 1823–1864, 2008) 最近开始比较它们并考虑如何将它们结合起来。本文旨在为这场辩论做出贡献。在概述了两种方法之间的一些相似之处和差异之后，我将讨论它们如何结合在一起，以更全面地了解隐喻在语言和思想中的作用。
Abstract Both cognitive linguists and relevance theorists are developing original approaches to metaphor. Both shed new light on old debates and suggest fruitful directions for research. Although there has so far been little interaction between the two approaches, Raymond Gibbs and Markus Tendahl (Mind & Language 21: 379–403, 2006, Journal of Pragmatics 40: 1823–1864, 2008) have recently begun to compare them and consider how they might be combined. This paper is intended as a contribution to that debate. After outlining some parallels and differences between the two approaches, I will discuss how they might fit together to give a fuller picture of the role of metaphor in language and thought.