A Randomized Trial of Deferred Stenting Versus Immediate Stenting to Prevent No- or Slow-Reflow in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (DEFER-STEMI)

A Randomized Trial of Deferred Stenting Versus Immediate Stenting to Prevent No- or Slow-Reflow in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (DEFER-STEMI)
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.530
复制
发表时间:
2014-05-27
影响因子:
24
通讯作者:
Berry, Colin
Berry, Colin
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Carrick, David;Oldroyd, Keith G.;Berry, Colin

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的 本研究的目的是评估在初次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 (PCI) 治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死 (STEMI) 时,延迟支架置入是否可以减少无复流并挽救心肌。 背景 无复流与 STEMI 的不良结局相关。 方法 这是一项前瞻性、单中心、随机、对照、概念验证试验,对象为无复流危险因素≥1 的再灌注 STEMI 患者。随机分组为延迟支架置入术和 4 至 16 小时后意向支架置入术,或常规治疗和立即支架置入术。主要结局是无/慢复流的发生率(心肌梗死中的溶栓
Objectives The aim of this study was to assess whether deferred stenting might reduce no-reflow and salvage myocardium in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).Background No-reflow is associated with adverse outcomes in STEMI.Methods This was a prospective, single-center, randomized, controlled, proof-of-concept trial in reperfused STEMI patients with >= 1 risk factors for no-reflow. Randomization was to deferred stenting with an intention-to-stent 4 to 16 h later or conventional treatment with immediate stenting. The primary outcome was the incidence of no-/slow-reflow (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction