Public space in an age of austerity
Public space in an age of austerity
复制标题
DOI：
10.1057/s41289-019-00082-w
复制
发表时间：
2019-12-01
影响因子：
2.6
通讯作者：
Tietjen, Anne
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Carmona, Matthew;Hanssen, Gro Sandkjaer;Tietjen, Anne
通过对2008年至2017年十年间的概述，并对四个北方欧洲城市进行比较，本文反思了这些紧缩时期公共空间性质的变化以及塑造公共空间的过程。本文以伦敦、哥本哈根、马尔莫、奥斯陆等城市为例，探讨这一时期公共空间的设计、开发、使用和管理过程。有证据表明，我们已经见证了一个重大创新的时期，同时也面临着对公共空间的集体方法的重大挑战。这导致了不同形式的公共空间，无论是好是坏，由于本文讨论的趋势，空间;期望;私人/公共领域;景观;喘息;基础设施;转移;创收;安全;短暂的城市;社区控制;占领;劣势;和下降。本文件阐述了不断变化的做法，并累积揭示了紧缩时期的独特和重大变化，尽管不一定是以预期的方式。相反，在这四个城市中，紧缩政策的影响似乎被其他不断发展和竞争的公共政策目标以及不断发展的公共空间类型所掩盖。
Through an overview of the decade 2008 to 2017, and looking comparatively across four northern European cities, this paper reflects on the changing nature of public space during these austerity years and on the processes of shaping public spaces. The paper draws from the experiences of London, Copenhagen, Malmo and Oslo to explore processes of the design, development, use and management of public spaces during this period. The evidence suggests that we have witnessed a period of significant innovation, side by side with major challenges to the collective approach to public spaces. This has led to distinct forms of public spaces that for good or ill have multiplied as a result of the trends discussed in the paper, spaces of; expectation; the private/public sphere; spectacle; respite; infrastructure; diversion; income generation; security; the ephemeral city; community control; occupation; disadvantage; and decline. Episodes of changing practice are set out in the paper and cumulatively reveal distinct and significant changes during the austerity era, although not necessarily in the manner that might have been expected. Instead, in these four cities, the impact of austerity seems to have been eclipsed by other evolving and competing public policy goals, and by the evolving range of public space types.