Is LEA symbol better compared to Snellen chart for visual acuity assessment in preschool children?
Is LEA symbol better compared to Snellen chart for visual acuity assessment in preschool children?
复制标题
DOI:
10.22336/rjo.2019.7
复制
发表时间:
2019-03
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
U. Vivekanand;Sarita R J Gonsalves;Shailaja Bhat
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
U. Vivekanand;Sarita R J Gonsalves;Shailaja Bhat
Aim: To compare visual acuity using the LEA symbol chart with Snellen E test chart in preschool children of age 3-5 years. Patients and methods: Inclusion criteria: 50 emmetropic children aged 3 to 5 years. Exclusion criteria: Strabismus, amblyopia, ametropia, and any organic eye disease. A pseudo randomized protocol was used to test visual acuity (VA) in each subject monocularly on both eyes using Snellen E chart and LEA symbol chart. Visual acuity for both charts was scored as smallest optotype size which the child correctly identified 3 of maximum 4 optotypes. The strength of agreement on VA between two charts was tested using Interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). A Mann-Whitney U test was applied to compare both the groups. Results: Boys: Girls = 26:24 with a mean age and standard deviation of 4.12 + 0.79 years. ICC between Snellen’s and LEA symbol chart was 0.256 and 0.213 for right and left eye respectively. Analysis of the two samples using Mann-Whitney test showed a significant difference between the two charts (p value <0.000). Conclusion: LEA symbol test showed only a fair agreement with Snellen E charts for visual acuity measurements. Visual acuity measurement with LEA symbol chart showed significantly higher scores as compared to Snellen’s chart.