Driving behaviour in a real and a simulated road tunnel - A validation study
Driving behaviour in a real and a simulated road tunnel - A validation study
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/s0001-4575(97)00099-7
复制
发表时间：
1998-07-01
影响因子：
5.9
通讯作者：
Tornros, J
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Tornros, J
其目的是验证在模拟道路隧道中的驾驶行为。20名受试者分别在真实隧道和VTI驾驶模拟器模拟的同一隧道中进行速度和横向位置测量。在这两种情况下，都使用了左手转向和手动变速的乘用车。模拟隧道的行驶速度高于真实隧道。在这两种情况下，从速度计中消除速度信息会导致类似的小速度增加。此外，在两种情况下，不同车道之间的速度差异是相似的。对速度变化的影响与对速度水平的影响相似。关于横向位置，在真实隧道中，受试者将汽车放置在离最近的隧道壁略远的地方，而在模拟隧道中。在这两种情况下，当距离最近的墙壁位于驾驶员左侧时，距离距离比位于对面的距离大。当荷载为直线段时，横向位置偏差大致相同，但在弯曲段时，模拟隧道的横向位置偏差略大。结论是，绝对的行为效度不太令人满意，特别是在速度选择方面，而相对效度在速度和横向位置方面都很好。1998爱思唯尔科学有限公司版权所有。
The aim was to validate driving behaviour in a simulated road tunnel. Speed and lateral position of 20 subjects were measured in a real tunnel and in the same tunnel implemented in the VTI driving simulator. In both situations a left-hand steered and manually geared passenger car was used. Driving speed was higher in the simulated tunnel than in the real tunnel. Elimination of speed information from the speedometer caused a similar small speed increase in both situations. Also, the difference in speed between driving lanes was similar in both cases. The effects on speed variation were similar to that for speed level. Regarding lateral position, subjects positioned the car somewhat further away from the nearest tunnel wall in the real tunnel than in the simulated tunnel. In both situations the distance to the nearest wall was greater when it was located to the left of the driver than on the opposite side. Lateral position deviation was about the same when the load was straight, but in a curved section it was somewhat greater for the simulated tunnel. It is concluded that behavioural validity in absolute terms was not quite satisfactory, especially regarding choice of speed, whereas relative validity was good for both speed and lateral position. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.