Why was Standing Rock and the #NoDAPL campaign so historic? Factors affecting American Indian participation in social movement collaborations and coalitions
Why was Standing Rock and the #NoDAPL campaign so historic? Factors affecting American Indian participation in social movement collaborations and coalitions
复制标题
为什么立岩和
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2019
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Erich W. Steinman
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Erich W. Steinman
摘要#NoDAPL动员，这是历史上不寻常的，作为一个全国性的基层运动，具有美国印第安人基层活动家和部落政府与其他人联合，是未来类似努力的指标？或者，基于一系列独特的情况，站在岩石上的抵抗会是一个相对的偏差吗？为了探索这些问题，我借鉴了关于美国定居者殖民主义的理论和历史奖学金;跨群体合作和社会运动联盟;和美国印第安人运动。各种组内，组间和更大的结构性因素构成重大障碍，美国印第安人参与基层社会运动联盟。然而，引人注目的威胁，美国印第安人运动和环境运动之间存在的社会联系，以及每个运动产生的意识形态和框架之间的重叠，足以产生强大的联盟动员。
ABSTRACT Is the #NoDAPL mobilization, which was historically unusual as a national scale grassroots campaign featuring American Indians grassroots activists and tribal governments in coalition with others, an indicator of future similar efforts? Or, will the Standing Rock resistance be a relative aberration, based on a unique set of circumstances? To explore these questions, I draw upon theory and historical scholarship about American settler colonialism; cross-group collaborations and social movement coalitions; and American Indian movements. A variety of within-group, intergroup and larger structural factors pose significant obstacles to American Indian participation in grassroots social movement coalitions. However, striking threats, the existence of social ties between American Indian movements and environmental movements, and overlap between ideologies and frames generated by each movement were sufficient to generate robust coalitional mobilization.