In Too Deep: Class and Mothering in a Flooded Community

In Too Deep: Class and Mothering in a Flooded Community
复制标题

太深了:洪水社区中的阶级和母爱

DOI:
10.1177/00943061231181317r
复制
发表时间:
2023
期刊:
Contemporary Sociology
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Larry G. Morton II
Larry G. Morton II
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Larry G. Morton II

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

指出结束讨论的其他研究指出,“长时间驾驶”影响肝脏,并有健康代价的段落。但接下来的段落重点转向2019年《美国残疾人法》针对优步和Lyft的诉讼。也许这些问题没有答案。但由于研究人员都在纽约twa,也许负责档案的人,或者纽约市的肿瘤学家,可以解释这种潜在的联系?或者他们甚至不应该提出问题,只是注意到这份文件表明,驾驶导致的健康问题比之前预期的要严重得多?我还发现,副标题为“COVID-19时期的司机”的结论在某种程度上具有误导性。更多关注的是加州的AB-5法案,该法案假定工人是雇员而不是独立承包商,以及由此产生的22号提案(该提案在1099和W-2分类之外创建了第三类工人)。AB-5确实在2020年初生效,但将本章描述为关注Covid的影响——尤其是在很少提及这一点的情况下——感觉很奇怪。第二章比最后一章更关注疫情,更关注司机生活的财务化。抛开这些担忧不谈,我觉得这本书是一本有趣的读物,它提供了一个独特的框架来审视优步经济中对司机劳动力和他们自己的剥削。
point to finish the paragraph discussing other studies that note that "long driving" impacts the liver and that there are health tolls. But then the focus in the following paragraph turns to 2019 ADA suits against Uber and Lyft. Maybe there are no answers to these questions. But since the researchers were at the NYTWA, perhaps someone in charge of the archives, or a New York City oncologist, could explain the potential link? Or perhaps they should not even raise the questions, just note that this document suggested that driving led to more considerable health concerns than previously expected? I also found the conclusion, subtitled "Drivers in the Time of COVID-19," to be somewhat misleading. There’s much more focus on California’s AB-5, which presumed workers to be employees rather than independent contractors, and the resulting Proposition 22 (which created a third category of worker outside the dichotomy of 1099 and W-2 classification). AB-5 did go into effect at the start of 2020, but describing this chapter as focusing on the Covid impact—especially when there’s minimal mention of this—feels odd. There’s much more focus on the pandemic in Chapter Two, on financializing drivers’ lives, than in this final chapter. Those concerns aside, I found this book to be an interesting read that provides a unique framework for examining the exploitation of drivers’ labor—and selves—in the Uber economy.