Why TTIP is a game-changer and its critics have a point
Why TTIP is a game-changer and its critics have a point
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/13501763.2016.1254273
复制
发表时间：
2017-01-01
影响因子：
4.2
通讯作者：
Siles-Brugge, Gabriel
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
De Ville, Ferdi;Siles-Brugge, Gabriel
关于跨大西洋贸易和投资伙伴关系（TTIP）的激烈学术和公共辩论主要集中在两个问题上。首先，TTIP除了涉及全球最大的贸易伙伴之外，还有什么特别之处吗？其次，对TTIP有害影响的担忧是否合理？我们的论点的出发点是，理解TTIP这样的协议需要强调现实的社会建构性质。TTIP在其规定的监管范围方面最终是新颖的，它是有问题的，因为它巧妙地促进了那些只认为监管是低效的繁文缛节的人的（社会构建的）利益。
The heated scholarly and public debate on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) has centred predominantly on two questions. Firstly, is there something particularly special about TTIP, other than the fact that it involves the world's largest trading partners? And, secondly, is the concern about TTIP's deleterious effects justified? The starting point for our argument is that understanding an agreement like TTIP requires an emphasis on the socially constructed nature of reality. TTIP is ultimately novel in terms of the regulatory scope of its provisions, and it is problematic because it subtly promotes the (socially constructed) interests of those who merely see regulation as inefficient red tape'.