Elucidating the component processes involved in dyslexic and non-dyslexic reading fluency: An eye-tracking study
Elucidating the component processes involved in dyslexic and non-dyslexic reading fluency: An eye-tracking study
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.cognition.2008.10.005
复制
发表时间：
2008-12-01
期刊：
影响因子：
3.4
通讯作者：
Branigan, Holly P.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jones, Manon W.;Obregon, Mateo;Branigan, Holly P.
快速自动化命名（RAN）和阅读流畅性之间的关系是有据可查的（参见Wolf，M. & Bowers，P.G.（1999年）。发展性阅读障碍的双缺陷假说。Journal of Educational Psychology，91（3），415-438，for a review），但是关于哪些组成过程在RAN中是重要的，以及为什么发展性阅读障碍者在这些任务上显示更长的延迟，知之甚少。研究人员不同意这些延迟是否是由受损的语音处理引起的，或者是否额外的语音处理也起作用（例如，克拉克，P.，Hulme，C.，& Snowling，M.（2005年）。RAN和阅读的个体差异：反应时间分析。Journal of Research in阅读，28（2），73-86; Wolf，M.，Bowers，P.G.，& Biddle，K.（2000年）的第10/2000号决议。命名速度的过程，时间，和阅读：一个概念性的审查。Journal of Learning Disabilities，33（4），387-407）.我们进行了眼动追踪研究，操纵语音和视觉信息（代表外语音过程）在RAN。线性混合效应分析的结果表明，语音和视觉加工对阅读障碍者和非阅读障碍者的命名速度都有影响，但对阅读障碍者的影响更大。此外，诵读困难的读者在这些领域的困难主要出现在一个措施，明确包括生产阶段的命名。这项研究阐明了支持RAN性能在非阅读障碍读者和精确定位阅读障碍读者的困难领域的过程。我们讨论了这些研究结果参考命名速度赤字的语音和语音外的假设。(C)2008 Elsevier B. V.保留所有权利。
The relationship between rapid automatized naming (RAN) and reading fluency is well documented (see Wolf, M. & Bowers, P.G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 415-438, for a review), but little is known about which component processes are important in RAN, and why developmental dyslexics show longer latencies on these tasks. Researchers disagree as to whether these delays are caused by impaired phonological processing or whether extra-phonological processes also play a role (e.g., Clarke, P., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. (2005). Individual differences in RAN and reading: A response timing analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 28(2), 73-86; Wolf, M., Bowers, P.G., & Biddle, K. (2000). Naming-speed processes, timing, and reading: A conceptual review. Journal of learning disabilities, 33(4), 387-407). We conducted an eye-tracking study that manipulated phonological and visual information (as representative of extra-phonological processes) in RAN. Results from linear mixed (LME) effects analyses showed that both phonological and visual processes influence naming-speed for both dyslexic and non-dyslexic groups, but the influence on dyslexic readers is greater. Moreover, dyslexic readers' difficulties in these domains primarily emerge in a measure that explicitly includes the production phase of naming. This study elucidates processes underpinning RAN performance in non-dyslexic readers and pinpoints areas of difficulty for dyslexic readers. We discuss these findings with reference to phonological and extra-phonological hypotheses of naming-speed deficits. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.