A Review of Theory and Research on the Assumptions of Miller'S Response Competition (Conflict) Models: Response Gradients.
A Review of Theory and Research on the Assumptions of Miller'S Response Competition (Conflict) Models: Response Gradients.
复制标题
米勒反应竞争（冲突）模型假设的理论和研究综述：反应梯度。
DOI：
10.1080/00221309.1977.9918503
复制
发表时间：
1977
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
F. Heilizer
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
F. Heilizer
这是对米勒冲突模型所依据的假设所发表的理论和研究的回顾。单目标和多目标条件之间的操作区别，以及在后者中，空间、时间和刺激维度。研究结果的主要操作差异是单目标与多目标条件以及拉力与其他措施。对米勒的公设系统的支持是模棱两可的，对几个备选公设有相当大的支持。一个较好的解释是，响应梯度可以假设任何程度的陡度或普遍性，作为几个操作和选择条件的函数。一个操作变量，测试前的时间，产生更平坦的梯度，模拟未实践的时间过程效应。一个主要的未完成的研究领域涉及求和假设，或者更一般地说，说明响应梯度的组合原则。
This is a review of published theory and research on the assumptions that underlie Miller's conflict models. Operational distinctions are made between single-goal and multiple-goal conditions and, within the latter, the spatial, temporal, and stimulus dimensions. Major operational divergences in research outcomes are single- vs. multiple-goal conditions and strength-of-pull vs. other measures. Support for Miller's postulate system is equivocal, with considerable support available for several alternate postulates. A preferred interpretation is that response gradients can assume any degree of steepness or generality as a function of several manipulation and selection conditions. One manipulation variable, time before testing, produces flatter gradients which simulate unpracticed time-course effects. A major unfinished research area deals with the summation hypothesis or, more generally, specification of principles of combination for response gradients.