Cultural Accommodation: Hybridity and the Framing of Social Obligation
Cultural Accommodation: Hybridity and the Framing of Social Obligation
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1606
复制
发表时间：
1998-06
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
D. Oyserman;Izumi Sakamoto;A. Lauffer
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
D. Oyserman;Izumi Sakamoto;A. Lauffer
在个人主义-集体主义的框架内探讨了文化适应-杂交的含义。个人主义强调个人，并将个人作为分析的单位，而集体主义强调社会，并将个人作为相互联系的社会单位的一部分。在两个实验中，我们探讨了个人主义、集体主义和身份突出对不同他人的社会义务的影响方式。作者在被试中改变了社会义务的个人目标中断（成就-愉悦）、目标（个人-群体）和焦点（群体-更大的社会）。作者假设，当身份被突出时，集体主义会增加对内群体的义务；个人主义本身就会削弱社会义务；这种文化融合（个人主义和集体主义都很高）将增加对更大社会的义务。
Implications of cultural accommodation-hybridization were explored within the framework of individualism-collectivism. Individualism highlights the personal and centralizes individuals as the unit of analyses, whereas collectivism highlights the social and contextualizes individuals as parts of connected social units. In 2 experiments, the ways in which individualism, collectivism, and identity salience influence social obligation to diverse others was explored. The authors varied the personal goal interrupted (achievement-pleasure), the target (individual-group), and focus (in-group-larger society) of social obligation within subjects. The authors hypothesized that collectivism would increase obligation to the in-group when identity was made salient; that individualism alone would dampen social obligation; and that cultural accommodation-hybridization (being high in both individualism and collectivism) would increase obligation to larger society.