Comparison between a Noncontact Uroflowmeter and a Medical Uroflowmeter in Terms of Uroflowmetry Variables
Comparison between a Noncontact Uroflowmeter and a Medical Uroflowmeter in Terms of Uroflowmetry Variables
复制标题
非接触式尿流量计和医用尿流量计在尿流量测量变量方面的比较
DOI：
10.11239/jsmbe.58.54
复制
发表时间：
2020
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
中島 一樹
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
金山 義男;上村 匠;池上 駿介;北村 寛;中島 一樹
本研究旨在验证我们开发的非接触式尿流计。非接触式尿流计与医用尿流计在尿流测量变量方面进行了比较。我们同时使用尿流量计评估健康男性的假尿和尿液，并比较尿流方式、排尿时间、排尿量、平均和最大尿流率。两种尿流仪的尿流模式相似。在假性尿的情况下，两种尿流仪仅在排尿时间上存在显著差异，非接触式尿流仪的排尿时间明显短于医用尿流仪。然而，在尿流方面，两种尿流仪在尿流测量变量方面没有观察到显著差异。从这些结果来看，将非接触式尿流计用于医疗用途的可能性增加了。
The present study aimed to validate a noncontact uroflowmeter developed by us. The noncontact uroflowmeter was compared to a medical uroflowmeter in terms of uroflowmetry variables. We used the uroflowmeters simultaneously to assess pseudourine and urine of healthy males, and compared the urinary flow pattern, voiding time, voided volume, and average and maximum urinary flow rates. Both uroflowmeters yielded similar urinary flow patterns. In the case of pseudourine, the two uroflowmeters differed significantly only in voiding time, which was significantly shorter with the noncontact uroflowmeter than with the medical uroflowmeter. However, with regard to urine, no significant differences were observed in the terms of uroflowmetry variables between the uroflowmeters. From these results, the possibility of using the noncontact uroflowmeter for medical use has increased.