The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire

The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire
复制标题

DOI:
10.1007/s10067-010-1546-8
复制
发表时间:
2011-03-01
影响因子:
3.4
通讯作者:
Ercan, Songul
Ercan, Songul
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ediz, Levent;Hiz, Ozcan;Ercan, Songul

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

修订后的纤维肌痛影响问卷(FIQR)试图解决纤维肌痛影响问卷(FIQ)的局限性。由于没有土耳其语版本的FIQR可用,我们的目的是调查土耳其语翻译的FIQR在土耳其女性纤维肌痛(FM)患者中的有效性和可靠性。将FIQR翻译成土耳其语后,对87名女性FM患者进行了治疗。所有患者均填写调查问卷和土耳其版FIQ、医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)、简表36(SF-36)。根据拇指触诊确定的压痛点计算压痛点计数(TPC)。一周后,FM患者在第二次就诊时填写了土耳其FIQR。土耳其语FIQR问题的重测信度在0.714到0.898之间。总分的重测信度为0.835。FIQR访问1(第一次评估)和FIQR访问2(第二次评估)的Cronbach‘s Alpha分别为0.89和0.91,表明两种评估的内部一致性水平均可接受。FIQR总分与FIQ总分呈显著正相关(r=0.87,P<0.01)。FIQR总分和领域分与SF-36的FIQ、HADS和各分量表之间也存在显著的结构效度相关(FIQR总分与SF-36躯体部分分和心理部分分的相关系数分别为r=-0.63,P<0.01和r=-0.51,P<0.01)。土耳其FIQR是测量FM健康状况的可靠而有效的工具,显示出足够的信度和结构效度。由于土耳其语版本在措辞、遗漏、概念和评分方面存在问题,因此它可以在讲土耳其语的人群中替代FIQ用于临床实践和研究。
The Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR) attempts to address the limitations of the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ). As there is no Turkish version of the FIQR available, we aimed to investigate the validity and reliability of a Turkish translation of the FIQR in Turkish female fibromyalgia (FM) patients. After translating the FIQR into Turkish, it was administered to 87 female patients with FM. All of the patients filled out the questionnaire together with a Turkish version of the FIQ, hospital anxiety and depression scales (HADS), short form-36 (SF-36). The tender-point count (TPC) was also calculated from tender points identified by thumb palpation. One week later, FM patients filled out the Turkish FIQR at their second visit. The test-retest reliability of the Turkish FIQR questions ranged from 0.714 to 0.898. The test and retest reliability of total FIQR score was 0.835. Cronbach's alpha was 0.89 for FIQR visit 1 (the first assessment) and 0.91 for FIQR visit 2 (the second assessment), indicating acceptable levels of internal consistency for both assessments. The total scores of the FIQR and FIQ were significantly correlated (r = 0.87, P < 0.01). Significant correlations for construct validity were also obtained between the FIQR total and domain scores and the FIQ, the HADS and the subscales of the SF-36 (FIQR total versus SF-36 physical component score and mental component score were r = -0.63, P < 0.01 and r = -0.51, P < 0.01, respectively). The Turkish FIQR is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring health status in FM, showing sufficient reliability and construct validity. It may be utilized for both clinical practice and research use in the Turkish-speaking population in place of FIQ, since its Turkish version has problems in the wording, omissions, concepts, and scoring from the original FIQ.