Positive emotion in distress as a potentially effective emotion regulation strategy for depression: A preliminary investigation

Positive emotion in distress as a potentially effective emotion regulation strategy for depression: A preliminary investigation
复制标题

痛苦中的积极情绪作为抑郁症潜在有效的情绪调节策略:初步调查

DOI:
10.1111/papt.12176
复制
发表时间:
2018
期刊:
Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Takebayashi Yoshitake
Takebayashi Yoshitake
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Yamaguchi Keiko;Ito Masaya;Takebayashi Yoshitake

文献摘要

相似文献

目的在负性情绪状态下利用积极情绪进行情绪调节可能是缓解情绪障碍患者抑郁和焦虑问题的有效途径之一。本研究探讨了心理测量特性和增量效度的积极情绪在苦恼量表(PEIDS),一个新开发的自我报告量表,在日本大学生的样本。设计和方法为了研究的心理测量特性的PEIDS,规模完成了日本大学生(396名男性和363名女性;平均年龄为19.92)。参与者还回答了情绪调节问卷,沉思和反思问卷-简短版,情感风格问卷,积极和消极的情感时间表,和医院焦虑和抑郁量表。调查进行了两个时间点相隔1个月,以评估重测信度和效度的PEIDS.ResultsExploratory和验证性因素分析证实了一个单因素结构。信度证实了高的内部一致性和重测稳定性,收敛和判别效度证实了相关和无关变量的相关性。分层回归分析的结果表明,积极情绪的困扰可能会预测抑郁症以上和超越基线抑郁症和其他常见的情绪regulation strategies.ConclusionsThe PEIDS在年轻人和日本的非临床人群中表现出可接受的信度和效度。积极情绪在临床人群中的作用还需要进一步的研究。实践者指出,以前的研究表明,积极情绪在通过某种形式的心理治疗从抑郁和焦虑问题中恢复过来方面起着关键作用。衡量个体差异的程度,人们可以体验到积极的情绪在消极的情绪状态。结果表明,主观评定在抑郁情境中体验积极情绪的能力对抑郁的缓解有积极作用,但对焦虑的缓解无积极作用,积极情绪在抑郁情境中的调节效果优于其他情绪调节策略。
ObjectivesEmotion regulation utilizing positive emotion during negative emotional states might be one of the effective ways to alleviate depression and anxiety problems among people with emotional disorders. This study examined the psychometric properties and incremental validity of the Positive Emotion In Distress Scale (PEIDS), a newly developed self‐report scale, in a sample of university students in Japan.Design and methodsTo examine the psychometric properties of the PEIDS, the scale was completed by Japanese university students (396 men and 363 women; mean age of 19.92). Participants additionally answered the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, Rumination and Reflection Questionnaire – Shorter Version, Affective Style Questionnaire, Positive and Negative Affective Schedule, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. The survey was conducted at two time points separated by 1 month to assess test–retest reliability and validity of the PEIDS.ResultsExploratory and confirmatory factor analyses confirmed a one‐factor structure. Reliability was confirmed by high internal consistency and test–retest stability; the convergent and discriminant validity was confirmed by correlations with related and unrelated variables. The results of hierarchical regression analyses demonstrated that positive emotion in distress might predict depression above and beyond the effect of baseline depression and other common emotion regulation strategies.ConclusionsThe PEIDS showed acceptable reliability and validity within young adults and a non‐clinical population in Japan. Further research will be needed to examine the effect of positive emotion among clinical populations.Practitioner pointsPrevious research suggests that positive emotions play a key role in recovery from depression and anxiety problems through some forms of psychotherapy.The Positive Emotion In Distress Scale (PEIDS) measures individual differences regarding the extent to which people can experience positive emotions in negative emotional states.Results suggested that the subjective rating of the ability to experience positive emotions in distress might alleviate depression prospectively but not anxiety problems.The effect of positive emotion in distress demonstrated to have beyond the effects of other emotion regulation strategies.