Team sport athletes' perceptions and use of recovery strategies: a mixed-methods survey study.

Team sport athletes' perceptions and use of recovery strategies: a mixed-methods survey study.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1186/s13102-017-0071-3
复制
发表时间:
2017
期刊:
BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Halson S
Halson S
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Crowther F;Sealey R;Crowe M;Edwards A;Halson S

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

运动员使用各种各样的恢复策略,尽管目前还没有研究调查不同竞技水平的团队运动运动员对恢复的看法和使用。采用问卷调查的方法对不同竞技水平的团体运动员的恢复技术进行了调查。具体来说,本研究调查了是否、何时、为什么以及如何使用以下恢复策略:主动陆基恢复(ALB)、主动水基恢复(AWB)、拉伸(STR)、冷水浸泡(CWI)和对比水疗法(CWT)。331名运动员接受了调查。57%的人使用了一种或多种恢复策略。拉伸被认为是最有效的恢复策略(4.4/5),而ALB被认为是最无效的(3.6/5)。认为水浸策略有效/无效的主要原因是心理因素;相比之下,STR和ALB被认为有效/无效主要是由于物理原因。本研究表明,运动员可能没有意识到恢复策略对他们身体恢复的具体影响,因此鼓励运动员和教练进行恢复教育。这项研究还提供了关于不同恢复策略的流行程度的新信息和背景信息,这些信息可能有助于指导教练和运动员的最佳实践。
A variety of recovery strategies are used by athletes, although there is currently no research that investigates perceptions and usage of recovery by different competition levels of team sport athletes. The recovery techniques used by team sport athletes of different competition levels was investigated by survey. Specifically this study investigated if, when, why and how the following recovery strategies were used: active land-based recovery (ALB), active water-based recovery (AWB), stretching (STR), cold water immersion (CWI) and contrast water therapy (CWT). Three hundred and thirty-one athletes were surveyed. Fifty-seven percent were found to utilise one or more recovery strategies. Stretching was rated the most effective recovery strategy (4.4/5) with ALB considered the least effective by its users (3.6/5). The water immersion strategies were considered effective/ineffective mainly due to psychological reasons; in contrast STR and ALB were considered to be effective/ineffective mainly due to physical reasons. This study demonstrates that athletes may not be aware of the specific effects that a recovery strategy has upon their physical recovery and thus athlete and coach recovery education is encouraged. This study also provides new information on the prevalence of different recovery strategies and contextual information that may be useful to inform best practice among coaches and athletes.