Agency coalitions for targeted service delivery: foiled designs, failed development, but final delight.
Agency coalitions for targeted service delivery: foiled designs, failed development, but final delight.
复制标题
DOI：
10.2190/tubd-6cja-0atl-n059
复制
发表时间：
1982-01-01
影响因子：
1.3
通讯作者：
Baranowski, T
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Baranowski, T
鉴于最近联邦政府试图促进机构联盟以发展和协调健康教育-降低风险计划，回顾了一个州促进这种联盟的早期经验。回顾有关人力服务组织结构(领域理论)、组织间协作和专业概念风格的文献，揭示了促进机构联盟的四个必要但不充分的指导方针。首先，必须获得一些充足的外部资金来源。第二，联盟应该有一个组织结构，在三个组织领域都有委员会。第三，必须认识到各种相互竞争的机构的自身利益，并加以利用。第四，在竞争机构参与的范围内，合作项目应该是短期的和结构化的(如果需要高度相互依赖)，或者是长期的非互动项目。
In light of recent federal attempts at promoting agency coalitions for developing and coordinating health education-risk reduction programs, the earlier experience of one state in promoting such a coalition is reviewed. A review of the literature on human service organization structure (domain theory), interorganizational collaboration and professional conceptual styles, revealed four necessary but not sufficient guidelines for promoting agency coalitions. First, some source of adequate outside funding must be obtained. Second, the coalition should have an organizational structure which has committees in each of the three domains of organization. Third, the self-interests of the various competing agencies must be recognized and capitalized upon. Fourth, to the extent competing agencies are involved, the collaborative projects should be either short-term and structured (if high interdependence is required) or long-term noninteracting projects.