Qualitative teamwork issues and strategies: Coordination through mutual adjustment

Qualitative teamwork issues and strategies: Coordination through mutual adjustment
复制标题

DOI:
10.1177/1049732304272015
复制
发表时间:
2005-03-01
影响因子:
3.2
通讯作者:
Patterson, K
Patterson, K
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hall, WA;Long, B;Patterson, K

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

包括教师,学生和志愿者在内的多学科研究团队可以为所有参与者带来挑战和丰富。虽然这样的团队越来越普遍,但关于提高团队效率的策略的指导很少。在这篇文章中,作者强调的战略,通过协调团队成员和任务的基础上相互调整,指导定性团队合作。使用扎根的理论范例,他们专注于以下问题:(a)建立团队,(B)发展反思性和理论敏感性,(c)处理分析和方法程序,以及(d)制定传播指南。分享信息、阐明项目目标和要素、承认个人目标的差异、互惠互利和相互尊重的合作是相互调整的关键要素。作者总结了关于该过程的成本和效益的结论。
Multidisciplinary research teams that include faculty, students, and volunteers can be challenging and enriching for all participants. Although such teams are becoming commonplace, minimal guidance is available about strategies to enhance team effectiveness. In this article, the authors highlight strategies to guide qualitative teamwork through coordination of team members and tasks based on mutual adjustment. Using a grounded theory exemplar, they focus on issues of (a) building the team, (b) developing reflexivity and theoretical sensitivity, (c) tackling analytic and methodological procedures, and (d) developing dissemination guidelines. Sharing information, articulating project goals and elements, acknowledging variation in individual goals, and engaging in reciprocity and respectful collaboration are key elements of mutual adjustment. The authors summarize conclusions about the costs and benefits of the process.