An annotated and critical glossary of the terminology of inclusion in healthcare and health research.
An annotated and critical glossary of the terminology of inclusion in healthcare and health research.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1186/s40900-020-00186-6
复制
发表时间：
2020-01-01
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Small, Neil
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Islam, Shahid;Small, Neil
在卫生规划、服务提供和研究中，吸纳公众参与的重要性已被置于重要地位。但这一地位掩盖了所用术语不明确的问题。本文确定了在基于社区的卫生参与相关词汇中常用的术语，旨在阐明其含义，从而减少歧义。我们对与吸纳参与相关的关键术语进行定义和区分，考虑与社区参与过程以及吸纳参与所面临挑战相关的术语，并探讨常用的“参与阶梯”这一比喻的优缺点。我们希望为在卫生领域追求各种形式的吸纳参与过程中，清晰地传达意图、挑战和成果做出贡献。
The importance of including members of the public has been accorded a significant position in health planning, service delivery and research. But this position masks a lack of clarity about terms that are used. This paper identifies terms that are in common use in the lexicon of community based involvement and engagement in health with the intention of clarifying meaning and thus reducing ambiguity. We define and distinguish between key terms related to inclusion, we consider the terminology attached to community processes and to the challenges of inclusion and we engage with the strengths and weaknesses of the commonly used metaphor of "a ladder of participation". We wish to contribute to the clear communication of intentions, challenges and achievements in pursuing varied forms of inclusion in health.