Priming affects poor sleepers but not normal sleepers on an insomnia ambiguity task.
Priming affects poor sleepers but not normal sleepers on an insomnia ambiguity task.
复制标题
在失眠模糊任务中，启动会影响睡眠质量差的人，但不会影响正常睡眠的人。
DOI：
10.1111/j.1365-2869.2009.00792.x
复制
发表时间：
2010
影响因子：
4.4
通讯作者：
Ellis J
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ellis J
随着认知偏差作为失眠的维持因素的作用越来越受到重视，顺序效应对解释反应的影响应该被检查并随后加以解释。本研究的目的是研究在测试感知偏差之前询问参与者的睡眠经历是否会影响与睡眠相关的模糊任务的反应。117名本科生不知道实验的目的，在完成失眠模糊任务（IAT）之前或之后，分别发给他们睡眠功能失调信念和态度量表（DBAS‐10）和失眠严重程度指数（ISI）。正如预期的那样，多变量方差分析表明，参与者完成任务的顺序影响了那些先给出dba - 10和ISI的人在IAT上的反应，比那些先给出IAT的人表现出更大的失眠相关解释。然而，经过更仔细的检查，这种影响只在那些被定义为睡眠不好的人身上显现出来，而睡眠正常的人基本上不受测试顺序的影响。研究结果在涉及内隐认知任务的睡眠相关研究协议的设计和管理方面进行了讨论。
With increasing importance being placed on the role of cognitive biases as a maintaining factor in insomnia, the influence of order effects on interpretative responses should be examined and subsequently accounted for. The aim of the present study was to examine whether asking participants about their sleep experiences, prior to testing for a perceptual bias, affects responses on a sleep‐related ambiguity task. One hundred and seventeen undergraduate students, blind to the aims of the experiment, were issued either the Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes to Sleep scale (DBAS‐10) and Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) before, or following, completion of an Insomnia Ambiguity Task (IAT). As expected, a multivariate analysis of variance showed that the order in which participants completed the task affected the responses on the IAT with those given the DBAS‐10 and ISI first, showing greater insomnia‐related interpretations than those given the IAT first. However, on closer examination, this effect was evident only for those who were defined as poor sleepers, and that normal sleepers were largely unaffected by the order in which the tests are given. The results are discussed in terms of design and management of sleep‐related research protocols involving implicit cognitive tasks.