Recollection rejection of false narrative statements
Recollection rejection of false narrative statements
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/09658210600648449
复制
发表时间：
2006-08-01
期刊：
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
Estrada, S.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Brainerd, C. J.;Reyna, V. F.;Estrada, S.
我们的研究集中在模糊痕迹理论中假设的错误记忆编辑操作 * 回忆拒绝。主要目标是（a）扩展基于模型的测量这一操作的叙事任务，应该确保高水平的回忆拒绝和（B）研究五个操纵，应该影响回忆拒绝通过影响的可及性逐字痕迹的叙事陈述：近的叙事介绍，叙事重复，类型的错误记忆项目，测试延迟，和重复测试。结果表明，叙述任务确实产生了高水平的回忆，在最初的记忆测试中，估计有49%的gist-consistent干扰物被拒绝。与当前错误记忆编辑的理论概念相一致，结果还表明，回忆拒绝增加作为操作的功能，应该提高逐字痕迹的叙述性陈述的可访问性，重复测试提供特别大的增加逐字可访问性。
Our research was focused on a false-memory editing operation that is posited in fuzzy-trace theory* recollection rejection. The main objectives were (a) to extend model-based measurement of this operation to a narrative task that ought to ensure high levels of recollection rejection and (b) to study five manipulations that ought to influence recollection rejection by affecting the accessibility of verbatim traces of narrative statements: recency of narrative presentation, narrative repetition, type of false-memory item, testing delay, and repeated testing. The results showed that the narrative task did indeed yield high levels of recollection, with an estimated 49% of gist-consistent distractors being rejected in this way on initial memory tests. Consistent with current theoretical conceptions of false-memory editing, the results also showed that recollection rejection increased as a function of manipulations that should enhance the accessibility of verbatim traces of narrative statements, with repeated testing delivering especially large increases in verbatim accessibility.