Where have all the equations gone? A unified view on semi-quantitative problem structuring and modelling

Where have all the equations gone? A unified view on semi-quantitative problem structuring and modelling
复制标题

DOI:
10.1080/01605682.2022.2039565
复制
发表时间:
2022-03
影响因子:
3.6
通讯作者:
E. Settanni;R. Heijungs;J. Srai
E. Settanni;R. Heijungs;J. Srai
中科院分区:
管理学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
E. Settanni;R. Heijungs;J. Srai

文献摘要

相似文献

摘要几十年来,结构建模一直在帮助决策者承担探索和解释复杂情况的认知负担。三种著名的技术-在这里统称为半定量问题结构和建模(SPSM)-包括ISM(解释结构建模); MICMAC(矩阵影响Croisés-Multiplication Quanquée à un Classement);和DEMATEL(决策制定试验和评估实验室)。SPSM方法开创了图论原理和人机交互的联合应用。然而,今天的模板式研究方法盛行,专注于应用环境,而不是寻求推进或批判性地评估个别技术本身。本文通过比较和对比(针对每种技术)通常被视为理所当然的分析和程序方面,提出了SPSM的统一方法论观点,这是目前文献中缺失的。该论文的研究结果强调:(1)以前未被注意的重叠之间的技术,到目前为止一直被认为是相互排斥的,和不一致的那些往往是共同应用的; 2)潜在的问题时,SPSM的关键分析原则,无论是不加批判地应用或完全免除; 3)需要利用人机交互,这是早期SPSM研究中的一个突出方面,现在却令人惊讶地被忽视了。这些研究结果说明了SPSM应用程序的背景下,供应链风险管理的审查。
Abstract For several decades structural modelling has assisted decision makers with the cognitive burden of exploring and interpreting complex situations. Three well-known techniques – labelled collectively here as semi-quantitative problem structuring and modelling (SPSM) – include ISM (Interpretive Structural Modelling); MICMAC (Matrice d’Impacts Croisés-Multiplication Appliquée à un Classement); and DEMATEL (DEcision MAking Trial and Evaluation Laboratory). SPSM approaches pioneered the joint application of graph-theoretical principles and human-computer interaction. Yet today a template-style research approach prevails, focusing on the application context rather than seeking to advance or critically assess the individual techniques in their own right. This paper develops a unifying methodological view of SPSM, currently missing in the literature, by comparing and contrasting – for each technique – analytical and procedural aspects typically taken for granted. The paper’s findings highlight: (1) Previously unnoticed overlaps between techniques that up to now have been deemed mutually exclusive, and incongruences between those that are often applied jointly; 2) Potential issues that arise when key analytical principles of SPSM are either applied uncritically or dispensed with altogether; 3) The need to leverage human-computer interaction, a prominent aspect in early SPSM research that is now surprisingly neglected. These findings are illustrated by a review of SPSM applications in the context of supply chain risk management.