Comparing Homeowner Societies: Can we Construct an East-West Model?
Comparing Homeowner Societies: Can we Construct an East-West Model?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/02673030701387614
复制
发表时间：
2007-07
期刊：
影响因子：
3.2
通讯作者：
R. Ronald
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Ronald
近几十年来，工业化社会出现了不同的大规模住房拥有者模式，并在住房制度的比较分析中变得越来越重要。本文考察了业主占领主导住房需求和政策体系的两个特定社会群体内部和之间的差异和相似之处，一个由讲英语的盎格鲁-撒克逊社会组成，另一个由东亚社会组成。本文考虑了在制度、政权和社会意识形态关系方面基于核心分歧形成松散模式的可能性。其目的是在国际范围内进一步说明住房制度和福利制度之间的相互作用。住房和福利要素的比较在不同社会之间是广泛相关的，而不是在数量上孤立的，因为整个东亚地区的制度差异很大。然而，一个松散的系统模型提供了相当大的洞察力，以了解关于住房制度如何服务于最低限度的社会福利制度类型的群体内部的趋同。
Distinguishable patterns of mass homeownership have emerged across industrialised societies in recent decades, and have become increasingly central in comparative analyses of housing systems. This paper examines the nature of differences and similarities within and between two particular groups of societies where owner occupation dominates housing demand and policy systems, one constituted of English-speaking, Anglo-Saxon societies, and another of East Asian societies. The paper considers the potential of forming loose models based on core divergences in terms of systems, regimes and socio-ideological relationships. The aim is to further illustrate interactions between housing systems and welfare regimes in international contexts. Comparisons of housing and welfare elements are broadly related between societies, rather than quantitatively isolated, as systems are substantially variegated across the East Asian region. However, a loose system-model provides considerable insight into convergence within the group in regards to how housing systems have served a minimal social-welfare regime type.