Collective Memory in a Global Age
Collective Memory in a Global Age
复制标题
全球化时代的集体记忆
DOI：
10.1177/0011392109348544
复制
发表时间：
2010
影响因子：
2
通讯作者：
B. Misztal
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
B. Misztal
本文认为，试图概念化的记忆热潮在健忘症的社会，导致了两种理论立场之间的冲突：方法，强调记忆的意义和观点，坚持遗忘的价值。它断言，记忆的价值和遗忘的价值都不能被视为理所当然，并认为，任何寻求记忆和遗忘之间辩证关系的可能解决方案的努力都应该有利于培养与过去的关系，以增强当前的社会福祉。这样的推理使我们从塑造后民族主义团结政治共同体的能力来判断世界性记忆的价值。接受需要判断把过去服务于现在的行为，要求我们质疑世界公民身份的对比项目：一个声称，记住是维持全球公民身份的多元化和多样性的关键，另一个强调遗忘的重要性。在提出了关于记忆对世界公民发展的重要性的对比观点之后，本文寻找了一种更适合于旨在确保后民族主义团结和人权，同时保护文化权利，少数民族权利和个人身份的项目的记忆方法。
This article argues that attempts to conceptualize the memory boom in amnesic societies have resulted in a clash between two theoretical stands: the approach which stresses the significance of remembering and the perspective which insists on the value of forgetting. It asserts that neither the value of memory nor the value of forgetting can be taken for granted and argues that any search for possible resolutions to the dialectical relationship between remembering and forgetting should be taken in the interest of cultivating a relationship with the past that enhances societal well-being in the present. Such reasoning leads us to judge the value of cosmopolitan memory in terms of its capacity to shape post-nationalist solidaristic political communities. The acceptance of the need to judge the act of putting the past in the service of the present requires us to question the contrasting projects of cosmopolitan citizenship: one claiming that remembering is vital for sustaining plurality and diversity of a global citizenship, and the other that stresses the importance of forgetting for the emergence of the politics of a global citizenship. After presenting contrasting views on the importance of memory for the development of cosmopolitan citizenship, the article searches for an approach to memory which is better suited to projects that aim to ensure post-nationalistic solidarity and human rights while protecting cultural rights, minority rights and personal identity.