Does suppression of HBV replication by antiviral therapy confer the same benefit as host immune control of HBV?
Does suppression of HBV replication by antiviral therapy confer the same benefit as host immune control of HBV?
复制标题
通过抗病毒治疗抑制 HBV 复制是否与 HBV 宿主免疫控制具有相同的益处?
DOI:
10.1136/gutjnl-2014-306935
复制
发表时间:
2014
期刊:
影响因子:
24.5
通讯作者:
Lok,AnnaS
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Yapali,Suna;Lok,AnnaS
Approximately 50% of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) worldwide is attributed to chronic HBV infection. 1 Data from the population-based Risk Evaluation of Viral Load Elevation and Associated Liver Disease/Cancer-HBV REVEAL-HBV study showed that high levels of serum HBV DNA are associated with increased risk of cirrhosis, HCC and liver-related mortality. 2 The REVEAL-HBV study also demonstrated that among hepatitis B surface antigen positive persons with high levels of HBV DNA at enrolment, the risk of HCC was lower in those who had decline in HBV DNA levels during follow-up compared with those with persistently high levels of HBV DNA. These data suggest that antiviral therapy may decrease the risk of HCC through suppression of HBV replication. There has been only one randomised controlled trial of nucleos (t) ide analogue (NUC) treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) with HCC as one of the predefined outcomes. 3 This study comparing lamivudine versus placebo was terminated after a median of 32.4 months (range 1–42 months) because a significant difference in the composite outcome of disease progression which included HCC was observed between the two groups. At the time of study termination, HCC had occurred in 3.9% of the lamivudinetreated group and 7.4% of the placebo group with a HR of 0.49, and 95% CI 0.25 to 0.99 (p= 0.047); however, this difference was no longer significant when the five cases of HCC diagnosed during the 1st year were excluded (p= 0.052). A systematic review and a meta-analysis found that patients with CHB who received NUC had a lower incidence of HCC compared with untreated patients with CHB. 4 5 The difference between treated patients and untreated controls was greater in patients with cirrhosis, those with virological response and those who were hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive. Similar results were observed in several individual studies that compared the risk of HCC between patients with CHB receiving NUC and untreated patients with CHB. 3 6–8 However, these studies had one or more limitations:(1) inclusion of patients in various stages of HBV infection with small number of patients with cirrhosis and too few patients with HCC for meaningful analysis,(2) controls not well matched to treated patients,(3) duration of follow-up too short to observe a benefit of NUC therapy if any, or (4) inadequate data to examine effect of virological response to NUC therapy and HCC risk. One study of 818 HBeAgnegative Greek patients found that longterm NUC therapy did not reduce the risk of HCC even among those with virological remission; however, when the HCC cases diagnosed in the first 24months were excluded, patients with virological remission had a marginally lower incidence of HCC than those without (p= 0.062). 9 These data suggest that an adequate period of virological remission is needed to improve clinical outcome. Indeed, analysis of the long-term outcomes of patients in the phase 3 trial of tenofovir found that the observed incidence of HCC was similar to the predicted risk up to year 3 but significantly lower than predicted at the last follow-up (median 5.5 years). 10 Similarly, studies examining the effect of NUC therapy on liver fibrosis failed to show an improvement in liver biopsies obtained after 1year of NUC therapy but a significant decrease in fibrosis and even reversal of cirrhosis was observed in liver biopsies obtained after 3–5 years of NUC therapy. 11–13 The study by Cho et al14 is unique in that the incidence of HCC in 1378 patients with CHB (621 HBeAg-negative) treated with NUC was compared with 1014 inactive carriers to determine …