Grid, Group, and Grade
Grid, Group, and Grade
复制标题
网格、组和等级
DOI：
10.1177/1069397114555843
复制
发表时间：
2015
影响因子：
2.5
通讯作者：
F. Hendriks
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Maleki;F. Hendriks
由玛丽道格拉斯及其追随者提出的网格-群体文化理论（CT）是一个著名的和经常使用的文化分析框架。尽管道格拉斯本人对CT的详细操作相当谨慎，但许多学者试图衡量网格和群体，并在国家内部或国家之间的不同分析水平上沿着这些维度测试该理论的含义。在这篇文章中，我们认识到并讨论了围绕网格和组的运作，特别是在跨国层面上的一些严峻挑战。提出不同方面的组和网格，我们辩论，在一些测量，不同的和不相关的文化属性中使用的网格和组的操作化，使有效性和可靠性，这种操作化的问题。我们还表明，网格和组不能涵盖社会之间或内部的一些文化差异，因此，我们介绍和阐述了第三个维度：“等级”。我们证明，这方面是缺失的，急需在CT。
Grid–Group Cultural Theory (CT), developed by Mary Douglas and followers, is a well-known and often-used framework for the analysis of culture in the political–administrative world. Although Douglas herself was rather wary of detailed operationalization of CT, many scholars have tried to measure Grid and Group and tested implications of the theory along these dimensions at different levels of analysis, within or between nations. In this article, we recognize and discuss some grave challenges surrounding the operationalization of Grid and Group, particularly at the cross-national level. Presenting distinct facets of Group and Grid, we debate that in some measurements, divergent and unrelated cultural attributes are used in the operationalization of Grid and Group, making validity and reliability of such operationalization problematic. We also exhibit that Grid and Group cannot cover some cultural variances between or within societies; hence, we introduce and elaborate on a third dimension: “Grade.” We demonstrate that this dimension is missing and much-needed in CT.