Ventricular Arrhythmias After Left Ventricular Assist Device
Ventricular Arrhythmias After Left Ventricular Assist Device
复制标题
DOI:
10.1161/circep.113.000113
复制
发表时间:
2013-06-01
影响因子:
8.4
通讯作者:
Stecker, Eric C.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Nakahara, Shashima;Chien, Christopher;Stecker, Eric C.
The reported prevalence of ventricular arrhythmia (VA) after LVAD implantation varies on the basis of patient population (eg, causes of cardiomyopathy, indication for LVAD, type of LVAD), definition of the arrhythmia, method of surveillance, and time of follow-up. However, VAs are common adverse events after LVAD implantation, particularly in the first 30 days. VAs requiring cardioversion or defibrillation occurred in 24% of patients who received a HeartMate II during a median 126-day follow-up period in a bridge to transplant trial. 6 Similar findings have been seen in single-center observational studies, where VA have been reported to occur in 22% to 59% of LVAD recipients (Table). 6, 10–18 Incident VAs are also seen in patients who have not had VA before LVAD implant. Ziv et al14 retrospectively studied 91 consecutive patients who underwent implant of a firstgeneration Heartmate XVE device. Sixty-three percent of the patients in their cohort had ischemic cardiomyopathy and 42% used amiodarone before LVAD. VAs were defined as ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) detected by ICD interrogation, telemetry, or ECG and lasting≥ 30 s or requiring defibrillation or antitachycardia pacing. A total of 32 patients (35%) had VA after LVAD implant. Eighteen patients who had no VT before LVAD implant had de novo monomorphic VT after LVAD implant. Ten patients had de novo polymorphic VT or VF after LVAD implant as well. VAs are most common in the early postoperative period. In the HeartMate II bridge to transplant study, VA were much more common in the first 30 days after LVAD implant (annualized rate of 2.55 per patient-year) than in follow-up> 30 days (annualized rate of 0.45 per patient-year). 6 This supported observations by Ziv et al14 that 31 of 32 patients who had VA after first-generation LVAD implant had their first episode within 2 weeks of surgery. Andersen et al17 noted 9 of 12 patients (75%) who had sustained VT or VF experienced the arrhythmias within 4 weeks of LVAD placement. Other investigators have also reported similar findings, with VA occurring frequently during the early postoperative period and decreasing over the longer term. 16, 19 Mechanisms of VA in early and late postoperative periods have not been elucidated, but it is likely that perioperative adrenergic stimulation and the use of adrenergic agonists may play an important role in promoting early arrhythmias, whereas positive cardiac remodeling on LVAD support may be important in decreased VA later during followup. It is also important to note that although the majority of arrhythmias occur early, limited data suggest that a quarter to a third of patients may experience their first VA after 30 days. 6, 18 Both baseline factors and type of LVAD predict risk for VA. In 2 multivariable analyses, a previous history of VA before LVAD placement was associated with incidence of arrhythmias after LVAD implant. 18, 20 Several studies have also shown that ischemic pathogenesis of cardiomyopathy is a predisposing factor for VA after LVAD placement. 13, 14, 16, 21 The type of implanted assist device can also predict risk of VA. In a retrospective study of 124 patients with LVAD and 71 patients with bi-VAD, there was a significant 2-fold increase in risk for developing any type of arrhythmia in LVAD recipients versus bi-VAD recipients after adjusting for multiple variables. 19 In addition, several studies have shown an increased incidence of VA in continuous flow pumps compared with pulsatile pumps. 10, 12, 17 In a study reported in abstract, comparing the continuous flow HeartMate II with the pulsatile flow HeartMate XVE, 10 there was a 2-fold increase in rate …