Building-Related Symptoms, Energy, and Thermal Control in the Workplace: Personal and Open Plan Offices
Building-Related Symptoms, Energy, and Thermal Control in the Workplace: Personal and Open Plan Offices
复制标题
工作场所中与建筑相关的症状、能源和热控制：个人和开放式办公室
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Calautit
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
S. Shahzad;J. Brennan;D. Theodossopoulos;B. Hughes;J. Calautit
这项研究比较了个人和开放式办公室中与建筑物相关的症状，分别提供了对热环境的高水平和低水平控制。挪威的个性化方法为每个用户提供了一个个人办公室，在那里他们可以控制百叶窗、门、百叶窗和恒温器。相比之下，英国的开放式案例研究仅为坐在建筑物周边的有限居住者提供了对百叶窗和百叶窗的控制，而坐在远离窗户的地方的使用者无法控制环境。挪威的案例研究建筑采用了空调，而英国的案例采用了置换通风和自然通风。热舒适的实地研究采用问卷调查，环境测量和访谈。挪威模式的用户健康状况更好（28%），而英国模式的能源效率更高（高达10倍）。后续访谈证实了缺乏温度控制对用户健康的影响。对两栋建筑的能源性能和使用者健康进行了平衡的评价。
This study compared building-related symptoms in personal and open plan offices, where high and low levels of control over the thermal environment were provided, respectively. The individualized approach in Norway provided every user with a personal office, where they had control over an openable window, door, blinds, and thermostat. In contrast, the open plan case studies in the United Kingdom provided control over openable windows and blinds only for limited occupants seated around the perimeter of the building, with users seated away from the windows having no means of environmental control. Air conditioning was deployed in the Norwegian case study buildings, while displacement ventilation and natural ventilation were utilized in the British examples. Field studies of thermal comfort were applied with questionnaires, environmental measurements, and interviews. Users’ health was better in the Norwegian model (28%), while the British model was much more energy efficient (up to 10 times). The follow-up interviews confirmed the effect of lack of thermal control on users’ health. A balanced appraisal was made of energy performance and users’ health between the two buildings.