Design
Design
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/00404969.2019.1605672
复制
发表时间：
2019-01
期刊：
影响因子：
1
通讯作者：
Philip A. Sykas
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Philip A. Sykas
具有讽刺意味的是，对纺织品设计历史的研究受到了无处不在的设计的阻碍，因此它往往被认为是默契的，被忽视的。在五十年的纺织历史中，设计这个话题更多的是偶然出现在文章的正文中，而不是作为文章的主题。例如，Fiona Kerlogue （TH 28-2: 151）在一篇专门讨论东印度公司在占碑的贸易的文章中，顺便提到了印度巡逻对苏门答腊伊卡特纺织品图案的影响。虽然设计对纺织品制造成功的重要性是公认的，但它的本质却很少被阐明。Vanessa Habib （TH 28-2: 164）引用了1764年4月24日的《爱丁堡广告人》（Edinburgh Advertiser），引用了William Cheape的意图，即“尽一切努力改进图案”来改进爱丁堡的苏格兰地毯制造，但究竟是什么构成了这种改进是一个难以解释的问题。
It is an irony that the study of textile design history is impeded by the very ubiquity of design, and consequently its tendency to be held as tacit, and overlooked. In fifty years of Textile History, the topic of design has been more likely to appear incidentally in the body of an article than as its subject. For example, Fiona Kerlogue (TH 28-2: 151) mentions in passing the influence of traded Indian patolas on the patterns of Sumatran ikat textiles within an article devoted to the East India Company trade at Jambi. And while the importance of design to success in textile manufacture is commonly acknowledged, its nature is rarely elucidated. Vanessa Habib (TH 28-2: 164), quoting the Edinburgh Advertiser of 24 April 1764, cites the intention of William Cheape to improve Edinburgh’s Scotch carpet manufacture with “all due attention to the improvement of the patterns” but what might have constituted such improvement is a difficult matter to extricate.