HYDROBORATION .49. EFFECT OF STRUCTURE ON SELECTIVE MONO-HYDROBORATION OF REPRESENTATIVE CONJUGATED DIENES BY 9-BORABICYCLO[3.3.1]NONANE
HYDROBORATION .49. EFFECT OF STRUCTURE ON SELECTIVE MONO-HYDROBORATION OF REPRESENTATIVE CONJUGATED DIENES BY 9-BORABICYCLO[3.3.1]NONANE
复制标题
DOI:
10.1021/jo00400a007
复制
发表时间:
1978-01-01
影响因子:
3.6
通讯作者:
KRAMER, GW
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
BROWN, HC;LIOTTA, R;KRAMER, GW
It was previously suggested that this difference inthe po-sition taken by boron in the hydroboration of 1, 3-cyclopentadiene and 1, 3-cyclohexadiene with disiamylborane might be the result of differences in the steric requirements of the planar C-5 ring and the puckered C-6ring. 11 The same ex-planation may be utilized for 9-BBN. In the case of 2, 5-dimethyl-2, 4-hexadiene, discussed earlier, the directive influence of the terminal methyl substituents directs the 9-BBN moiety to the allylic position (eq 4). Here the reaction can also be controlled to yield the monohydroboration product predominantly. It was suggested that further hydroboration would be resisted since it would place the second 9-BBN moiety in thecrowded adjacent position. Possibly the same explanation may hold for the cyclohexenyl intermediate (eq 8). Irrespective of the precise explanation of the phenomenon, the fact is that the reaction readily pro-ceeds cleanly to give the allylic derivative. Such allylic deriv-atives are quite reactive, readily adding to the carbonyl group of aldehydes and ketones. 13Recently, we had occasion to synthesize a series of tertiary alcohols with thestructure l-aryl-l-(A2-cyclohexenyl) etha-nol. Apparently, it is not feasible to convert 1-chloro-or 1-bromo-2-cyclohexene into the corresponding Grignard re-agents. The synthesis was successfully accomplished by treating the corresponding acetophenone derivatives with the 9-BBN adduct (eq 9). 15