Norms against voting for coerced reform
Norms against voting for coerced reform
复制标题
反对投票强制改革的规范
DOI：
10.1037//0022-3514.64.3.347
复制
发表时间：
1993
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
J. Jurney
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Baron;J. Jurney
一些改革，如通过一项禁止性法律或一项有约束力的协议来解决社会困境，涉及强制。在假设的情况下，学生有时会说他们不会支持强制改革，即使他们承认改革会改善问题。党卫军为这种抵制辩护，指出改革会伤害一些群体（尽管帮助了许多其他群体），人们应该能够做出的选择会被剥夺（即，权利会受到侵犯），或者改革会造成成本或收益的不公平分配
Some reforms, such as the passing of a prohibitive law or a binding agreement to solve a social dilemma, involve coercion. In hypothetical cases, Ss sometimes said they would not support coerced reforms even though they acknowledged that the reforms would improve matters. Ss justified such resistance by noting that the reform would harm some group (despite helping many others), that a choice would be taken away that people ought to be able to make (i.e., that a right would be violated), or that the reform would produce an unfair distribution of costs or benefits