Not so risky business: the use of planning within rock climbing
Not so risky business: the use of planning within rock climbing
复制标题
风险不大的事情：在攀岩中使用计划
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Brooke Thompson
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Patrick R. Young;R. Eklund;G. Tenenbaum;R. Glueckauf;Brooke Thompson
为了了解风险运动中的预防行为，本研究评估了参与者（n = 72）计划攀岩任务的程度及其对任务绩效的影响。参与者有不同程度的攀登经验，被随机分配到三个条件之一：（a）规划抑制，（B）规划，或（c）控制。结果表明，计划和控制参与者的计划行为显着（p < 0.01）比那些谁是计划抑制。此外，经验不足的参与者比经验丰富的参与者报告了更多的任务前想法和心理准备（p < 0.01）。虽然攀登时间没有显着不同的条件，连续计划抑制参与者爬得最慢，而参与者提示计划爬得最快。结果表明，虽然参与者似乎参与了一定程度的计划，但这种做法并不影响表现。讨论涉及使用规划作为一种预防行为在攀岩。
To understand precautionary behaviour within risk sport, the present study assessed participants’ (n = 72) degree of planning for a rock climbing task and its impact on task performance. Participants with varying degrees of climbing experience were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: (a) planning-inhibited, (b) planning, or a (c) control. Results indicated significantly (p < 0.01) more planning behaviour by planning and control participants than by those who were planning-inhibited. Additionally, inexperienced participants reported significantly (p < 0.01) more pre-task thoughts and mental preparation than experienced participants. Although climbing times were not significantly different among conditions, descriptively planning-inhibited participants climbed the slowest, while participants prompted to plan climbed the fastest. Results suggest that while participants appeared to engage in a degree of planning, the practice did not affect performance. Discussion concerns the use of planning as a precautionary behaviour in rock climbing.