Challenging identity hierarchies: Gender and consociational power-sharing
Challenging identity hierarchies: Gender and consociational power-sharing
复制标题
挑战身份等级：性别和社团权力分享
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Thomson
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Rónán Kennedy;Claire Pierson;J. Thomson
结社民主已成为权力分享、体制设计和冲突后建设和平领域最具影响力的范例。联合会为某些以前被排除在外的群体设立了代表权。然而，它同时抑制有效的政治代表性的群体不符合社会分工，联合会寻求容纳，特别是“额外的”性别分裂。鉴于在分裂的国家中广泛使用联合模式作为建设和平的工具，而且人们越来越认识到冲突对妇女的负面影响过大，令人惊讶的是，联合权力分享对妇女代表性的影响却没有得到考虑。本文认为，联合模式对妇女的代表性的具体影响。我们认为，由于性别问题是冲突中的一个组成因素，因此，它应该是冲突后治理的一个组成部分。以当代北方爱尔兰为例，说明了联合主义是一种“性别盲”理论。
Consociational democracy has become the most influential paradigm in the field of power-sharing institutional design and post-conflict peacebuilding. Consociation institutes representation for certain formerly excluded groups. However, it simultaneously inhibits effective political representation for groups that do not align with the societal divisions that consociation seeks to accommodate, specifically the ‘additional’ cleavage of gender. Given the extensive use of the consociational model as a peacebuilding tool in divided states and the growing awareness of the disproportionate negative effect of conflict on women, there is a surprising lack of consideration of the effect that consociational power-sharing has on women’s representation. This article considers the specific impact that the consociational model has on women’s representation. We argue that because gender is an integral factor in conflict, it should therefore be integral to post-conflict governance. With empirical reference to contemporary Northern Ireland, it is illustrated that consociationalism is a ‘gender-blind’ theory.
北爱尔兰的性别和社团权力分享
影响因子：
2.2
作者：
Hayes B
通讯作者：
Hayes B