A Comment on Andrew C. Papanicolaou’s “BEYOND EDDINGTON’S ARGUMENT
A Comment on Andrew C. Papanicolaou’s “BEYOND EDDINGTON’S ARGUMENT
复制标题
对安德鲁·C·帕帕尼科拉乌《超越爱丁顿的论点》的评论
DOI：
10.1007/s12124-014-9264-4
复制
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Tetsuya
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kono;Tetsuya
我同意安德鲁C。帕帕尼科拉乌认为人类的认知能力可以到达真实的世界，但不同意他认为这个世界的秩序类似于我们的思维。在这篇评论文章中，我将首先为最近的一种被称为“实体实在论”或“参照实在论”的实用科学实在论辩护，这种实在论肯定了我们能够通过技术和工程设置而不是通过推理来到达真实的世界。在本文的后半部分，我还将参照詹姆斯·J·吉布森的生态心理学，肯定我们的感知能力也直接到达现实。
I agree with Andrew C. Papanicolaou’s claim that human beings’ cognitive ability can reach to the real world, but don’t agree with his claim that the order of this world is akin to our thought. In this commentary paper, I will first defend a recent pragmatic scientific realism called as “entity realism” or “referential realism” which affirms that we are able to reach the real world not by inference but by technological, engineering settings. In the second half of this paper, I will also affirm that our perceptual ability directly reaches the reality too, in referring to the ecological psychology of James J. Gibson.