Scintigraphic response by 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine scan correlates with event-free survival in high-risk neuroblastoma
Scintigraphic response by 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine scan correlates with event-free survival in high-risk neuroblastoma
复制标题
DOI:
10.1200/jco.2004.07.144
复制
发表时间:
2004-10-01
影响因子:
45.3
通讯作者:
Kletzel, M
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Katzenstein, HM;Cohn, SL;Kletzel, M
Purpose To investigate whether response to induction therapy, evaluated by metaiodobenzylguanadine (MIBG) and bone scintigraphy, correlates with event-free survival (EFS) in children with high-risk neuroblastoma (NB).Patients and Methods Twenty-nine high-risk NB patients were treated prospectively with an intensive induction regimen and consolidated with three cycles of high-dose therapy with peripheral blood stem-cell rescue. The scintigraphic response was evaluated by MIBG and bone scans using a semi-quantitative scoring system. The prognostic significance of the imaging scores at diagnosis and following induction therapy was evaluated.Results A trend associating worse 4-year EFS rates for patients with versus without osteomedullary uptake on MIBG scintigraphs at diagnosis was seen (35% +/- 11% v 80% +/- 18%, respectively; P = .13). Similarly, patients with positive bone scans at diagnosis had worse EFS than those with negative scans, although the difference did not receive statistical significance (34% +/- 10% v 83% +/- 15%, respectively; P = .06). However, significantly worse EFS was observed in patients with a postinduction MIBG score of greater than or equal to3 compared to those with scores of less than 3 (0% v 58% +/- 11%; P = .002). There was no correlation between bone scan scores and outcome following induction therapy.Conclusion MIBG scores greater than or equal to3 following induction therapy identifies a subset of NB patients who are likely to relapse following three cycles of high-dose therapy with peripheral blood stem-cell rescue, local radiotherapy, and 13-cis-retinoic acid. Alternative therapeutic strategies should be considered for patients with a poor response to induction therapy. (C) 2004 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.