Pooled testing to isolate infected individuals

Pooled testing to isolate infected individuals
复制标题

汇总测试以隔离感染者

DOI:
10.1109/ciss50987.2021.9400313
复制
发表时间:
2021
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Aldridge M
Aldridge M
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Aldridge M

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

群体测试的常见问题是:对于给定的个体数量和给定的流行率,需要多少次测试T '才能找到每个感染个体?然而,在真实的生活中,问题通常是不同的:对于给定数量的个体,给定的患病率,以及比T '小得多的有限数量的测试T,如何才能最好地使用这些测试?在这篇会议论文中,我们概述了两个模型在这个问题上的一些最新结果。首先,“实用”模型与COVID-19筛查相关,其测试具有高度特异性但不完全敏感性,表明在低患病率和高敏感性下,简单算法的表现优于简单算法。第二,具有完美测试的极低流行率的“理论”模型给出了有趣的新数学结果。
The usual problem for group testing is this: For a given number of individuals and a given prevalence, how many tests T'are required to find every infected individual? In real life, however, the problem is usually different: For a given number of individuals, a given prevalence, and a limited number of tests T much smaller than T', how can these tests best be used? In this conference paper, we outline some recent results on this problem for two models. First, the `practical' model, which is relevant for screening for COVID-19 and has tests that are highly specific but imperfectly sensitive, shows that simple algorithms can be outperformed at low prevalence and high sensitivity. Second, the `theoretical' model of very low prevalence with perfect tests gives interesting new mathematical results.
保守的两阶段小组测试
DOI: --
发表时间: 2020
期刊: arXiv.org
影响因子: --
作者:
Matthew Aldridge
通讯作者: Matthew Aldridge
关于双池测试的注意事项
DOI: --
发表时间: 2020
期刊: arXiv.org
影响因子: --
作者:
A. Broder;Ravi Kumar
通讯作者: Ravi Kumar
DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2019.2929938
发表时间: 2019-09-01
影响因子: 5.4
作者:
Lee, Kangwook;Chandrasekher, Kabir;Ramchandran, Kannan
通讯作者: Ramchandran, Kannan