A comparison of kitting and continuous supply in in-plant materials supply
A comparison of kitting and continuous supply in in-plant materials supply
复制标题
厂内物料供应中配套供应与连续供应的比较
DOI：
10.1080/00207543.2012.657806
复制
发表时间：
2013
影响因子：
9.2
通讯作者：
A. Brolin
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Hanson;A. Brolin
在厂内材料供应的背景下，配套件的进料原理经常被讨论为更常见的连续供应(也称为生产线库存)的替代方案。然而，很少有详细的研究描述装备和持续供应的相对影响。目前的论文确定了装备和持续供应的相对影响，并对这些影响是如何产生的提供了洞察。本文采用了瑞典汽车装配行业的两个案例研究的经验数据。在每一种情况下，连续供应都已被套件取代，从而可以在相同的生产环境中比较套件和连续供应。研究的绩效领域包括工时消耗、产品质量、灵活性、库存水平和空间要求。对每家公司负责试剂盒准备的生产工程师、装配工和操作员的采访有助于对这两种材料喂入原则的相对影响有一个广泛而详细的看法。
In the context of in-plant materials supply, the materials feeding principle of kitting is often discussed as an alternative to the more common continuous supply (also known as line stocking). However, there are few detailed studies describing the relative effects of kitting and continuous supply. The current paper identifies the relative effects of kitting and continuous supply, and provides insight into how these effects arise. The paper draws on empirical data from two case studies in the Swedish automotive assembly industry. In each of the cases, continuous supply has been replaced by kitting, enabling comparison of kitting and continuous supply in the same production environment. The performance areas studied include man-hour consumption, product quality, flexibility, inventory levels, and space requirements. Interviews with production engineers, assemblers, and operators responsible for kit preparation at each company contribute to a broad yet detailed view of the relative effects of the two materials feeding principles.