Examining the Incremental and Interactive Effects of Boldness With Meanness and Disinhibition Within the Triarchic Model of Psychopathy
Examining the Incremental and Interactive Effects of Boldness With Meanness and Disinhibition Within the Triarchic Model of Psychopathy
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/per0000182
复制
发表时间：
2016-07-01
影响因子：
2.8
通讯作者：
Hart, Stephen D.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Gatner, Dylan T.;Douglas, Kevin S.;Hart, Stephen D.
精神病态的三源模型（帕特里克，福尔斯，克鲁格，2009）包括3个表型域：卑鄙，去抑制和大胆。围绕大胆在精神病概念化和评估中的相关性持续存在争议。在目前的研究中，本科生（N = 439）完成了三重精神病测量（帕特里克，2010），以检查大胆和一系列理论上相关的外部标准之间的关联。大胆通常与亲社会或有害标准无关。大胆很少提供增量价值以上或相互作用的意义和去抑制相对于外部标准。勇气的古怪效果很少出现。研究结果表明，大胆可能不是精神病性人格障碍定义的核心结构。第五版的精神疾病的诊断和统计手册（美国精神病学协会，2013年）精神病的说明书的含义进行了讨论。
The triarchic model of psychopathy (Patrick, Fowles, & Krueger, 2009) comprises 3 phenotypic domains: Meanness, Disinhibition, and Boldness. Ongoing controversy surrounds the relevance of Boldness in the conceptualization and assessment of psychopathy. In the current study, undergraduate students (N = 439) completed the Triarchic Psychopathy Measure (Patrick, 2010) to examine the association between Boldness and a host of theoretically relevant external criteria. Boldness was generally unrelated to either prosocial or harmful criteria. Boldness rarely provided incremental value above or interacted with Meanness and Disinhibition with respect to external criteria. Curvilinear effects of Boldness rarely emerged. The findings suggest that Boldness might not be a central construct in the definition of psychopathic personality disorder. Implications for the 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (American Psychiatric Association, 2013) psychopathic specifier are discussed.