Theories of Social Networks
Theories of Social Networks
复制标题
社交网络理论
DOI:
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190251765.013.5
复制
发表时间:
2020
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Jan Arendt Fuhse
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Jan Arendt Fuhse
NETWORK researchers have long lamented a lack of theory of social networks (Granovet-ter, 1979; Wellman, 1983, p. 179). Social networks were studied empirically, or written about metaphorically, without worrying too much about their substance. Over the last 30 years, a number of researchers have attempted to fill this" theory gap." This chapter offers an overview of the most important approaches: the theory of action, pragmatist/interactionist approaches, and relational sociology.Borgatti and Lopez-Kidwell (2011) offer a distinction between" network theory," on the one hand, and" theory of networks" on the other. They view network theory as about the effects of social networks (eg, on social mobility), and theory of networks as covering the impacts on networks (eg, foci of activity). However, Borgatti and Lopez-Kidwell's can-didates are not really" theory," but formulations of network mechanisms: systematizing recurrent observable processes involving networks (Wimmer & Lewis, 2010, p. 139ff). A proper theoretical treatment has to take an additional step back and offer answers to the following questions: What are social networks? Why do they constitute important features of the social world? And how do they relate to other features like social categories and other cultural forms, resources and social mobility, formal organizations, and largescale fields of society? I focus on social networks because these are still the most important subject area of network research in the social sciences. Also, social relationships seem to be different from relations between symbolic forms, between actors and material objects, and between events. Therefore, we need different theory to cover these respective