Poverty PhDs: Funds of knowledge, poverty, and professional identity in academia
Poverty PhDs: Funds of knowledge, poverty, and professional identity in academia
复制标题
贫困博士：学术界的知识基金、贫困和职业认同
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2011
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Marc Chun
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Cutri;J. M. Manning;Marc Chun
与共同赤字方法相反，这种自我研究探讨了贫困人口所拥有的知识资金与他们在学术界发展专业身份之间的关系。这三位作者都超越了经济贫困的条件，但都发现贫困的精神条件仍然存在。我们的结论是，在物质贫困的条件下开发的选择技能和性格帮助我们导航研究生院，并继续有效地通知，但复杂的，我们的专业学术身份的发展。我们梳理除了精英统治的神话，并确定在贫困中发展的知识的可转移资金的价值。我们记录了我们自己的做法如何改变，因为认识到我们在贫困中发展的知识基金。
In contrast to the common deficit approach, this self-study explores the relationship between the funds of knowledge possessed by people of poverty and their development of professional identity in academia. All three authors have moved beyond conditions of financial poverty, but all find that the mental conditions of poverty persist. We conclude that select skills and dispositions developed in conditions of material poverty helped us to navigate graduate school and continue to productively inform, yet complicate, the development of our professional academic identities. We tease apart the myth of meritocracy and identify the value of transferable funds of knowledge developed in poverty. We document how our own practices have changed as a result of recognizing our funds of knowledge developed in poverty.