Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status as a Screening Test in Chinese:Reliability and Validity
Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status as a Screening Test in Chinese:Reliability and Validity
复制标题
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2008
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Z. Bao
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Z. Bao
目的：探讨专门用于评估非痴呆精神障碍认知功能的神经心理状态重复电池评估（RBANS）中文版的信度和效度。方法：对北京市城乡健康成人451名进行RBANS评估，其中97名成人进行简明韦氏成人智力量表（WAIS）和韦氏记忆量表测试。 12周后对41名成人进行RBANS重新评估，采用相关分析和因子分析对数据进行分析。结果：RBANS总量表的Cronbachsα系数为0.90；即时记忆、视觉空间、语言、注意力和延迟记忆的Cronbachsα系数分别为0.86、0.68、0.67、0.85和0.80。总量表的重测信度为0.90，各分量表的重测信度分别为0.65、0.68、0.53、0.80和0.79(P0.01)。RBANS评分与WAIS和WMS评分均呈显着正相关(r=0.21-0.59，P0.01)，但WAIS语言评分与语言评分无相关性。 RBANS.Lisrel 的视觉空间评分验证性因子分析表明 RBANS 的 5 个子量表模型为合理(χ2/df=4.13,CFI=0.91,NNFI=0.93,RMSEA=0.079,MI=0.80,0.74,0.61,0.38,0.61,0.90,0.66,0.60,0.81,0.60,0.81和0.73)。结论：中文版RBANS是一个可靠的工具认知功能评估具有合理的信度和效度。
Objective:To explore the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status(RBANS),which is specially for assessing cognitive functions in non-dementia mental disorders.Methods: Altogether 451 healthy adults who were recruited from both rural and urban areas in Beijing were evaluated with the RBANS,and 97 adults were tested with the Brief Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale(WAIS) and Wechsler Memory Scale simultaneously(WMS).Forty-one adults were reevaluated with RBANS 12 weeks later.The data was analyzed by using correlation analysis and factor analysis.Results: The Cronbachs'α coefficient of RBANS total scale was 0.90;the Cronbachs'α coefficients of immediate memory,visuospatial,language,attention and delayed memory were 0.86,0.68,0.67,0.85 and 0.80 respectively.The test-retest reliability of total scale was 0.90 and that of subscales were 0.65,0.68,0.53,0.80 and 0.79 respectively(P0.01).There were significant positive correlation between the scores of RBANS and those of WAIS and WMS(r=0.21-0.59,P0.01),except that there was no correlation between the language score of WAIS and the visuospatial score of RBANS.Lisrel Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the 5-subscale model of RBANS was reasonable(χ2/df=4.13,CFI=0.91,NNFI=0.93,RMSEA=0.079,MI=0.80,0.74,0.61,0.38,0.61,0.90,0.66,0.60,0.81,0.60,0.81 and 0.73).Conclusions:The Chinese version of RBANS is a reliable tool for cognitive function assessment with reasonable reliability and validity.