The Waqf as Suwwan Impact Crater, Jordan: Numerical Modeling of Crater Formation and Gravity Data
The Waqf as Suwwan Impact Crater, Jordan: Numerical Modeling of Crater Formation and Gravity Data
复制标题
约旦 Suwwan 陨石坑的 Waqf:陨石坑形成和重力数据的数值模拟
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2011
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
T. Kenkmann
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
K. Wünnemann;H. Kuhn;P. Janle;T. Kenkmann
CRATER FORMATION AND GRAVITY DATA K. Wünnemann, H. Kühn, P. Janle, T. Kenkmann, Museum für Naturkunde – Leibniz Institut an der Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, D-10115 Berlin, Germany, Institute for Geosciences, Dept. of Geophysics, Kiel University, D-24118 Kiel, Germany, Institut für Geowissenschaften, Universität Freiburg, Germany, (*kai.wuennemann@museum.huberlin.de). Introduction: The Waqf as Suwwan impact crater in Jordan is a small complex crater structure, approximately 6 km in diameter. The crater was only recently identified as an impact structure [1,2] but has been investigated by seismic and gravity surveying in 1970 and 1980 on behalf of the National Resource Authority (NRA) of Jordan for ore and hydrocarbon exploration. Morphologically the structure is characterized by (Fig.1a) a well pronounced 1 km wide central uplift with a maximum elevation of 40 m above the average topographic level, surrounded by a relatively flat crater moat filled with yet unknown post-impact sediments and wadi deposits, and a hummocky circular structure standing approximately 30 m above the surrounding terrain which was interpreted as the remains of the crater rim [3]. In a recent geostructural field study the crater morphology is described in more detail [4]. Besides the well-exposed surface expression of the crater the most striking observation is a pronounced positive bouguer gravity anomaly above the central uplift of 6.5 mGal (Fig.1b). Most crater structures similar in size show a negative anomaly [5], which is usually interpreted by a mass deficiency, caused by brittle fracturing and open cracks underneath the crater. This study aims at developing (1) a numerical model of the crater formation consistent with the morphological, morphometric surface observations and structural subsurface deformations based on seismic data and (2) a model of mass distribution underneath the crater that explains the observed gravity anomaly and is consistent with the results from (1).