Defining and teaching environmental literacy.

Defining and teaching environmental literacy.
复制标题

定义和教授环境素养。

DOI:
10.1016/s0169-5347(97)01207-x
复制
发表时间:
1997
影响因子:
16.8
通讯作者:
Stephen H. Schneider
Stephen H. Schneider
中科院分区:
生物学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Stephen H. Schneider

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在气候变化和生物多样性保护的界面上的心理争论是B用来帮助学生或公民学会区分:(a)事实问题与价值问题,(B)客观概率与主观概率。(c)自底向上的(自顶向下的)预测方法(e ~ l~~~~(统计)预测方法,(d)从混沌现象和系统中随机得出的确定性方法,(e)从小规模现象中得出的大规模方法,(f)直接从间接的验证和测试方法得出的直接方法,(g)从倡导认识论得出的科学方法,(h)从igms得出的定理。(i)不负责任的宣传带来的责任,(j)经济效率带来的社会公平,(k)未来估值带来的现在(即经济和社会的贴现),(1)非市场估值带来的市场,(m)公共权利带来的私人权利,(n)通过过度简化的隐喻带来的合法的s~ rn~~ if~~ at~ o~,对复杂问题的精读解释,(0)从肤浅或争论性的处理中谨慎地进行科学普及,(0)“类型2”错误(例如后果预测错误与政策应对错误的代价),以及(q)多学科;从跨学科的活动。​与上下文(解决实际问题的中间综合)一起研究(在一个学科内的研究)。我很早就区分了多学科活动和跨学科活动。通过“多学科”,我指的是许多不同学科的材料的组装,但很少涉及多学科共同帮助解释某些单一学科无法理解的系统现象
mental controversies at the interface of climate change and biodiversisity protection are what B use to help students or citizens learn to differentiate:(a) issues of fact from those of value,(b) objective from subjective probabilities.(c) bottomup draw-bred) from top-down~ e~ l~~~~ ca~-statistical) forecast methods,(d) deterministic from stochastic from chaotic phenomena and systems,(e) large-scale from small-scale phenomena,(f) direct from indirect methods of validation and testing,(g) scientific methods from advo-cacy epistemologies,(h) theorems from igms.(i) responsibfe from irrespon-sible advocacy,(j) social equity from economic efficiency,(k) present from future valuation (ie economic and social discounting),(1) market from non-market valuation,(m) public from private rights,(n) legitimate s~ rn~~ if~~ at~ o~ via metaphors from over-simplified, sound-bite expfanations of compfex issues,(0) careful science popularization from shallow or polemical treatments,(p>‘type type 2’errors (eg consequences forecast being wrong versus the co rices of the policy response being wrong), and (q) multidisciplinar; from interdiscipli-nary activities. These issues are the car-e above] is learning how ass must integrate content (knowledge from~~.. de~ t~ studies within onaf disciplines) with context (interiinary synthesis to address real robfem solving). I have long distin-guished between multi-and interdisciplinary activitie+. By ‘multidisciplinany’, I mesa the assembly of material Prom many different disciplines, but with little inten the multiple disciplines that together help to expiain some systems phenomena that cannot be understood by sin&e discipli-