Defining and teaching environmental literacy.
Defining and teaching environmental literacy.
复制标题
定义和教授环境素养。
DOI:
10.1016/s0169-5347(97)01207-x
复制
发表时间:
1997
影响因子:
16.8
通讯作者:
Stephen H. Schneider
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Stephen H. Schneider
mental controversies at the interface of climate change and biodiversisity protection are what B use to help students or citizens learn to differentiate:(a) issues of fact from those of value,(b) objective from subjective probabilities.(c) bottomup draw-bred) from top-down~ e~ l~~~~ ca~-statistical) forecast methods,(d) deterministic from stochastic from chaotic phenomena and systems,(e) large-scale from small-scale phenomena,(f) direct from indirect methods of validation and testing,(g) scientific methods from advo-cacy epistemologies,(h) theorems from igms.(i) responsibfe from irrespon-sible advocacy,(j) social equity from economic efficiency,(k) present from future valuation (ie economic and social discounting),(1) market from non-market valuation,(m) public from private rights,(n) legitimate s~ rn~~ if~~ at~ o~ via metaphors from over-simplified, sound-bite expfanations of compfex issues,(0) careful science popularization from shallow or polemical treatments,(p>‘type type 2’errors (eg consequences forecast being wrong versus the co rices of the policy response being wrong), and (q) multidisciplinar; from interdiscipli-nary activities. These issues are the car-e above] is learning how ass must integrate content (knowledge from~~.. de~ t~ studies within onaf disciplines) with context (interiinary synthesis to address real robfem solving). I have long distin-guished between multi-and interdisciplinary activitie+. By ‘multidisciplinany’, I mesa the assembly of material Prom many different disciplines, but with little inten the multiple disciplines that together help to expiain some systems phenomena that cannot be understood by sin&e discipli-