Evaluation of clinical methods for diagnosing bacterial vaginosis
Evaluation of clinical methods for diagnosing bacterial vaginosis
复制标题
DOI:
10.1097/01.aog.0000145752.97999.67
复制
发表时间:
2005-03-01
影响因子:
7.2
通讯作者:
Blume, J
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Gutman, RE;Peipert, JF;Blume, J
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the current clinical criteria for diagnosing bacterial vaginosis can be simplified by using 2 clinical criteria rather than the standard 3 of 4 criteria (Amsel's criteria).METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of 269 women undergoing a vaginal examination in the Women's Primary Care Center, Division of Research, or Colposcopy Clinic at Women & Infants Hospital. All 4 clinical criteria for diagnosing bacterial vaginosis were collected, and Gram stain was used as the gold standard. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each individual criterion, combinations of criteria, and a colorimetric pH and amine card. Receiver operating characteristic curve was generated to estimate the preferred pH and percentage of due cells for diagnosing bacterial vaginosis.RESULTS: The prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in our study population was 38.7%. Vaginal pH was the most sensitive of all the criteria, at 89%, and a positive amine odor was the individual criteria with the highest specificity, at 93%. Similar specificity was seen with combinations of 2 criteria and Amsel's criteria. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis yielded a preferred pH and percentage of due cells of 5.0 and 20%, respectively. However, a pH of 4.5 or greater improves sensitivity with minimal loss of specificity.CONCLUSION: ne clinical criteria for diagnosing bacterial vaginosis can be simplified to 2 clinical criteria without loss of sensitivity and specificity. (C) 2005 by ne American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.