The opposite of ubiquitous: How early adopters of fast-filling alt-fuel vehicles adapt to the sparsity of stations
The opposite of ubiquitous: How early adopters of fast-filling alt-fuel vehicles adapt to the sparsity of stations
复制标题
无处不在的反面：快速加油替代燃料汽车的早期采用者如何适应加油站的稀少
DOI：
10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.01.003
复制
发表时间：
2019
影响因子：
6.1
通讯作者：
M. Kuby
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Kuby
事实证明，交通运输是减少美国碳排放最困难的行业。随着86%的美国通勤者继续开车上班，应对紧迫的气候变化挑战需要明显转向替代燃料汽车(AFV)。然而，阻碍这一转变的是缺乏位置便利的加油站和充电站。这篇论文认为，我们不能从驾驶汽油车的人的加油习惯或他们对需要或想要加油站的地点所表示的偏好中得出结论，因为他们在使用无处不在的加油站网络时形成了这些习惯和偏好。我们还必须区分电动汽车的缓慢和/或家庭充电、混合动力汽车和弹性燃料汽车的灵活加油和充电以及快速加油/充电AFV所产生的不同行为。因此，本文回顾了有限的文献，揭示了在面对稀疏的加油站网络的现实时，实际早期采用单燃料、快速加油的AFV在哪里选择加油或充电的偏好。加油偏好通过(1)询问司机通常在哪里加油的调查，(2)在加油站拦截调查，以及(3)GPS和刷卡数据来揭示。现有的少数几项研究表明，司机通过更多地关注地点的便利程度来适应，而不是价格。与汽油和柴油车司机相比，司机更频繁地在相同的加油站加油，油箱或电池电量更高，更多的是在工作固定的旅程中，更多的是在中途，更少的是离家近的地方，更频繁的是在路上，而且需要走更多的弯路。为了将这些结果放在更广泛的背景下，本文将它们与电动汽车缓慢充电的显示偏好结果以及氢气和类似燃料的声明偏好结果进行了简要比较。本文讨论了这些发现对快速加油站基础设施的初始铺设的影响，并确定了我们对AFV实际加油和充电行为所知的差距。
Transportation is proving to be the most difficult sector for reducing U.S. carbon emissions. With 86% of American commuters continuing to drive to work, meeting the urgent climate-change challenge requires a pronounced shift to alternative-fuel vehicles (AFVs). Standing in the way of this transition, however, is the dearth of conveniently located refueling and recharging stations. This paper argues that we cannot generalize from the refueling habits of people driving gasoline cars, or from their stated preferences for where they would need or want stations, because they formed those habits and preferences while using a ubiquitous network of gasoline stations. We also must distinguish among the different behaviors engendered by slow and/or home charging of electric vehicles, flexible refueling and recharging of hybrids and flex-fuel vehicles, and fast refueling/charging AFVs. Therefore, this paper reviews the limited literature on the revealed preferences of where actual early adopters of single-fuel, fast-filling AFVs choose to refuel or recharge when faced with the reality of a sparse network of stations. Refueling preferences have been revealed by (1) surveys asking drivers where they usually refuel, (2) intercept surveys at stations, and (3) GPS and card-swipe data. The few existing studies suggest that drivers adapt by focusing more on convenience of locations than price. Drivers refuel more frequently at the same stations, at higher tank or battery levels, more on work-anchored trips, more in the middle of trips, less often near home, more often on their way, and take larger detours compared with drivers of gasoline and diesel vehicles. To put these results in a broader context, the paper compares them briefly with revealed-preference results for slow charging of electric vehicles and with stated-preference results for hydrogen and similar fuels. The paper discusses the implications of these findings for the initial rollout of fast-refueling station infrastructure and identifies gaps in what we know about actual AFV refueling and recharging behavior.
南加州压缩天然气 (CNG) 车队车辆的分散加油
影响因子：
9
作者：
Kelley, Scott;Kuby, Michael
通讯作者：
Kuby, Michael
DOI：
10.1016/j.trd.2013.08.004
发表时间：
2013-12
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
M. Kuby;Scott Kelley;J. Schoenemann
通讯作者：
M. Kuby;Scott Kelley;J. Schoenemann