Mentorship in academic general internal medicine
Mentorship in academic general internal medicine
复制标题
普通内科学术指导
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2005
影响因子：
5.7
通讯作者：
J. Tsevat
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Sara E. Luckhaupt;M. Chin;C. Mangione;R. Phillips;D. Bell;A. Leonard;J. Tsevat
背景：有效的指导对职业发展至关重要。提高导师可用性的策略包括一次指导多个被指导者，补偿导师，comentoring和远程mentoring.Objective：描述目前的趋势，在一般内科（GIM）导师。我们对GIM导师、GIM奖学金主任和GIM国立卫生研究院K24奖学金获得者进行了一项全国性的基于网络的横断面调查，以获取他们的指导经验，包括导师制、多名学员、导师制和远程导师制的薪酬。我们通过导师资助状况、教师类型、学术级别和性别比较了经验。结果：我们收集了111位导师的数据（77%为男性，54%为全职教授，68%为临床研究人员）。52人（47%）获得了导师资助。导师每人监督5（3，8）名学员的中位数（第25百分位数，第75百分位数），并愿意一次监督最多6（4，10）名学员。与没有资助的导师相比，有资助的导师有更多的当前学员（平均值分别为8.3 vs 5.1; P<.001）。正教授比副教授或助理教授有更多的当前学员（分别为8.0 vs 5.9 vs 2.4; P= 0.005）。94名（85%）导师有指导经验，三分之二的导师有远程指导经验。尽管大多数导师认为远程指导的要求不高，但大多数人也表示，远程指导对学员来说效果较差，而且对个人来说也不太有成就感。结论：GIM中的导师似乎已接近其指导能力，而且大多数人缺乏指导资金。辅导和远程指导是常见的。
BACKGROUND: Effective mentorship is crucial to career development. Strategies to improve the availability of mentors include mentoring multiple mentees at once, compensating mentors, comentoring, and long-distance mentoring.OBJECTIVE: To describe current trends in mentorship in general Internal Medicine (GIM).METHODS: We conducted a national cross-sectional web-based survey of GIM mentors, GIM fellowship directors, and GIM National Institutes of Health K24 grant awardees to capture their experiences with mentoring, including compensation for mentorship, multiple mentees, comentorship, and long-distance mentorship. We compared experiences by mentorship funding status, faculty type, academic rank, and sex.RESULTS: We collected data from 111 mentors (77% male, 54% full professors, and 68% clinician-investigators). Fifty-two (47%) received funding for mentorship. Mentors supervised a median (25th percentile, 75th percentile) of 5 (3, 8) mentees each, and would be willing to supervise a maximum of 6 (4, 10) mentees at once. Compared with mentors without funding, mentors with funding had more current mentees (mean of 8.3 vs 5.1, respectively; P<.001). Full professors had more current mentees than associate or assistant professors (8.0 vs 5.9 vs 2.4, respectively; P=.005). Ninety-four (85%) mentors had experience comentoring, and two-thirds of mentors had experience mentoring from a distance. Although most mentors found long-distance mentoring to be less demanding, most also said it is less effective for the mentee and is personally less fulfilling.CONCLUSIONS: Mentors in GIM appear to be close to their mentorship capacity, and the majority lack funding for mentorship. Comentoring and long-distance mentoring are common.
影响因子：
5.9
作者：
Ramanan, RA;Phillips, RS;Reede, JY
通讯作者：
Reede, JY